Thread: Spec V Owners..
View Single Post
Old Feb 7, 2003 | 10:17 AM
  #28  
mpg9999's Avatar
mpg9999
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria
mpg9999 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Originally posted by Shinobi
OK info from Nismo pre tunning Dyno, As for the engine codes if you read correctly you would see I said Enthusiast refer to the differences in parts in the engine if i really need to go that far....as the base= QR25b (Enthusiast) get it now? anyone that has responded this can act like you know nissan but when it comes to it your still learnin sorry to bash you all but you brought it on yourselves no hard feelins and the 3% drivetrain loss is from SE-R to Spec-V not literall specifics from car to pavement, compare the drive train loss from a Civic EX to a SE-R and you only get a %age of 4&1/2 percent loss....Its kind of like a learning curve which we have now shown is not applicable in this thread......Sorry for boggling whatever you thought you knew about your motor but i was driving this car before most of you thought about owning it.......Thanx Jeff......

Hey Strange Manny said He'd do it after hours.....(Timming)
First off, of course I’m still learning, and so are you. One thing you do need to learn is the English language. Secondly, you didn’t say anything about a 3% difference. Let me give you your exact words: "With an average dyno testing of 12% loss in the SE-R's drive train.....As only a 3% loss In the Spec-V's". And yes, you are right about the Spec V having a slightly better power curve, or rather it can stay in its powerband better with the shorter gears. This however does not have anything to do with drivetrain loss. It is an issue of gearing. The spec V has shorter gears. Also, I seriously doubt a stock spec v dyno's at 16 whp more then a base se-r.

Last edited by mpg9999; Feb 9, 2003 at 04:49 PM.