Originally Posted by Del La Sol 1320
no its not opinion, its called physics, i mean i guess you can argue that the laws of physics are merely a set of largely accepted opinions, but i think we can both agree that they are fact and in that case i'm right and your wrong
go ahead and respond if you want, but i'm just stating facts so i mean you really can't argue with me and i would imagine at this point you have nothing to say, but i'd love to see how far you can go to you can twist my "opinions" so you can be right
Are you kidding me?
It IS an opinion.
You told a dude that removing fairings will ONLY matter with a liter bike and NOT a 600.
Originally Posted by Del La Sol 1320
... a 600 won't be as bad, but a liter bike with out fairings is a hell of a thing to hang onto
Think about that del. You're talking about a liter bike that can max out at what true speed? 180? Tops? And a 600 that tops out at about 160 true speed.
Soooooooooooooo.......................what YOU'RE trying to say is that the laws of physics change DRASTICALLY from 160-180mph? Are you on crack? Fairings are fairings and they're put on a bike for a reason. I would NEVER ride a naked sportbike that was meant to have fairings on a track. I don't give a fuck whether it's a kawi Ninja 250 or a freaking Busa!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The buffeting you will receive at 160 cannot and
IS NOT any less than what you will recieve at 180. Saying it over and over again doesn't make it true del. But you can keep trying anyways......................
And I personally would never even think about riding someone else's bike on a track. Not unless I had the fundage to replace said bike!
