i know you aint talking bout me...

just remember, i aint the only one who "criticized" a photo. fuck, most of the time they learned something. who knew about white balance and how it really determines the quality of the picture. why not learn. itd be shit if you werent trying to learn anything else in your life.

back on page 10 when joe and company where talking bout who has what camera at home etc, i put my comment in there. i hope no one took me seriously. "ill make you all cry", yeah i was talking shit foreals,,, [roll the eyes]

a degree IS more than a piece of paper for those who did graduate from something. if it took someone 2 or 4 years or even their whole lifetime to walk across a stage, i def wouldnt give em shit,,,id congrat them. someone please quote me on when i said i was special or that i have more talent that exceeds anyone?

the only way this shit would get out of hand is when people contribute to it in a and b fashion. im guesing those would be your two cents?

And yeah you are right, there is noone on here TO determine what are the best pics. But people do have an eye for the camera and understand the concept of photography and when they comment on other peoples photos, those people should take note on how they could make their pics better.

And with that degree, i did learn something called typography. 90% of the people out there just type away hit return and end it with a period. Little do they know they have to understand the language of characters and their relation to the space around it. So when someone does show me some work and they dont get 100% positive comments, they arent supposed to cry and call themselves anti-photo or anti design nazi. Only those who been in critiques know that more than words are thrown at your work.

Aint no damn time in my book or no one elses to put up or shut up. But it was worth a try to get something going on with the people who had cameras and understood photography.