I see you edited your previous response. Good..because it made no sense. As a matter of fact I've produced more grammatically correct statements by dragging my balls across the keyboard, but that's beside the point.

Here are the issues.
1. You were driving on a Sat on a restricted license.
2. You passed a car while you were doing the speed limit
3. The cop pulled you over because the car next to you didn't keep up with the other car.

Ok...never mind that this sounds like bullshit from the word go, here's what you do.

Go to court. Show the judge a copy of your work schedule showing that you were working on a Sat and therefore that's why you thought you could drive. Then ask the cop what your speed was during the infraction. Since you were doing the speed limit this should be a non-issue since it shows that you weren't speeding. Then ask the cop what you were doing to be considered reckless. If what you are saying above is true (doubtful), the cop can only say that the car next to you didn't keep up with you and you were doing the speed limit, which is not a crime. The judge then slaps your wrist for the driving under restriction and you go home and beat off to pictures of dead animals.

But just so I can be clear about this....I think you're full of shit and were doing something else which caused the cop to pull you over

BTW...for the last fucking time...IT'S RECKLESS NOT WRECKLESS you non-English speaking dumbass