Thread: Air to water, or Air to Air?
View Single Post
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 10:11 PM
  #24  
MP5's Avatar
MP5
Team Rad Racing
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 0
From: HELLTRACK
MP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these parts
Default Re: Air to water, or Air to Air?
Originally Posted by Optimus Prime
You miss my point. Thats why I also asked what he has currently, tube and fin or bar and fin, also thickness would be pertinent information.
I have a 18.25" x 6" x 2.87" PWR intercooler. It is a tube and fin intercooler. It also is rated at 420 CFM. I am thinking about switching to air to water because no matter what, air to water is more efficent than air to air. I notice a huge difference in my car's performance between a warm day and a cold night. I know turbo cars have a difference, but from riding with friends in their cars and riding in mine, i loose too much power on warm days. Plus with me upgrading my setup, i plan on flowing more air and dont think the intercooler i have will keep up.
Reply