Thread: Evo vs. STI
View Single Post
Old May 14, 2007 | 07:07 AM
  #141  
Axelerate's Avatar
Axelerate
<3
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,503
Likes: 0
From: Va Beach
Axelerate Axelerate Axelerate Axelerate Axelerate Axelerate Axelerate Axelerate Axelerate Axelerate Axelerate
Default Re: Evo vs. STI

Road and Track is only one test.

Sport Compact Car recorded a 70.2 slalom and a .88 g on the pad. Car and Driver has pulled a 63.2 slalom and a 92g.
http://www.caranddriver.com/assets/d...nis350z_ts.pdf

Once AGAIN THOSE NUMBERS ARE ONLY A TEST. They dont mean shit on a track. Did you read that this time?????? That car in the test you posted is not a SEDAN! You are a sharp one!
Also the G wears better stock tires than a Z, there's your better magazine number.

Those "facts" as you say, change depending on who the fuck is doing the test. What are you having trouble understanding?

A longer wheelbase is not the end all of handling performance. That is a


FACT.


Can a G35 sedan beat a Nurburgring time of 8:26?
I guess all the race teams running Z's are wasting their time? Maybe they all should switch to heavier, slower four doors? According to you a longer wheel base makes it faster.

I guess we should all buy a Limo instead of a Elise. Great point!


Is that enought facts for you, or do you need cliff notes?




Back of the spelling bullshit, this isnt a fucking grammar forum. Thanks for playing.

Last edited by Axelerate; May 14, 2007 at 07:56 AM.