I think the NSX would have been taken much more seriously in the U.S. if they were... oh... ~$50,000 cheaper.
And LOL @ this:
Originally Posted by
MAD_DOHC
That doesn't really seem too reliable to me. Reliability should mean you don't have to get a new timing belt every 5 years or a fucking valve job every 15k miles. I never knew high maintenence meant reliable.
If that is your definition of reliable, follow that service schedule for every vehicle ever made and I don't think you'd find anything that wasn't reliable. Not even a *gasp* Ford.
And can it really be considered a "supercar"? It's a great sportscar yes, but just because it is overpriced doesn't make it a super car. That'd be like calling a Viper a supercar.
There is such a double standard with Hondas, it's silly.