Old Nov 24, 2003 | 09:25 AM
  #57  
HP Solutions's Avatar
HP Solutions
Not Yet
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 0
HP Solutions is infamous around these partsHP Solutions is infamous around these partsHP Solutions is infamous around these partsHP Solutions is infamous around these partsHP Solutions is infamous around these partsHP Solutions is infamous around these partsHP Solutions is infamous around these partsHP Solutions is infamous around these partsHP Solutions is infamous around these partsHP Solutions is infamous around these partsHP Solutions is infamous around these parts
Default

Originally posted by noshoes
Yo, I'm the ViPaH KiLaH!!! *sigh*

There's really no sense in quoting numbers on the dynojet until you put the car on a dynojet. It's as simple as that.

I sincerely doubt many NA NSXs could keep up with MR2 2NR though. If you folks have one in mind, set up a race!

BTW, I tuned the MR2 that they are getting said "conversion factor" from. I still have my doubts on the number differences, but nothing was changed (even weather or altitude) from one dyno to the next. The runs were made 1 day apart. I scratched my head after the dynojet pulls, but the customer (and just about every other customer as well) wanted the dynojet number.

*shrug* What really matters is how well the car accelerates, and the 1/4 mile is a great way to demonstrate that capability. I could care less about what horsepower number it takes to get one there, as long as they can run the number consistently.

I know of 2 local 500+rwhp cars that can't even break into the 11s due to traction problems even though they trap above 120mph. That's not very impressive, is it?
thanks noshoes,
sorry if i pissed anyone off about the dynojet #'s. If there is a NSX that is willing to race me, lets go. But on the other hand i was wondering who "thegentleart" is, PM me to tell me who you are