hks 272/272

or what?

ive heard of FP3,4 webcams etc...

im interested in seeing a responce on what would be the best setup in which i can run in this motor on the street. rough loupy idle is fine. im looking for the best overall powerband.

 

you wont like the 272 driving on the street there top end cams 264/268 0r 268/276 will give you the best power overall change your valve springs too

 

I'd go with Comp cams 101200s.

An HKS 272/272 setup is all top end power and the car really tries to push past the factory Rev limiter and if you have no internal tranny upgrades you won't be able to shift past that point anyways. A 264/272 would be suitable, but I have had better luck with Comp cams. FP cams would be a great choice as well considering their grinds are very similar to Comp's also they are the manufacturer FP uses. I would aviod Web cams.

 

so what would the comp 101200 cams be compared too

oh and the head consists of crower springs retainers and ferrera valves also have hks cam gears

 

ive heard good things out of reving the 2.0 high when built. but im more into tourqe.

what would be the cams id want for alot of low to mid range tourqe

 

actually Forced performance showed NO significant gains running a combo like that. Watch that miss information. But fp3's are made mainly for 2.3 strokers..i have some.

 

I definitely noticed more low end torque with the 101200's than either of the HKS combos( I tried 272/272 and 264/272). Also the HKS cams don't respond very well to adjustment with the cam gears, they worked best installed straight up for me. The Comps on the other hand allowed me to move my power range around without creating other problems.