Notices
Automotive Discussion Automotive talk that is not technical can be posted here. Posts must address the general population.

Acura NSX

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 07:44 AM
  #91  
Flite's Avatar
Flite
HHIC
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 19,087
Likes: 0
Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite
Default Re: Acura NSX

Originally Posted by titz
You take it back you son of a bitch.
Originally Posted by S2K_Guy
+1 F40 is still a hell of a car.
That was my point. There's no denying that they're outdated now though. Now-a-days you can have a comfortable, reliable car run just as fast as an F40 for less money. That takes nothing away from the fact that an F40 is one of the worlds most amazing cars.

And in the supercar world, the NSX has been the single most influential car in recent history.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #92  
cleanEK's Avatar
cleanEK
Thread Starter
Registered member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
From: RAF Lakenheath, UK
cleanEK is a jewel in the roughcleanEK is a jewel in the roughcleanEK is a jewel in the roughcleanEK is a jewel in the roughcleanEK is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Acura NSX

Wow, I was gone for a weekend and this thread blew up. lol
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #93  
JKim's Avatar
JKim
Hating...
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 0
From: In the NSX
JKim has disabled reputation
Default Re: Acura NSX

I remember talking about the NSX here along time ago.

I argued that the NSX was a failure in the US market due to its lack of performance, poor selling numbers, and outrageous price.

That is still my contention today. If it was the most influential car in recent history...it sure didnt show it by its poor acceptance in the US market.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 10:11 AM
  #94  
DickButt's Avatar
DickButt
DEY SEE ME TROLLIN
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte,NC
DickButt DickButt DickButt DickButt DickButt DickButt DickButt DickButt DickButt DickButt DickButt
Default Re: Acura NSX

Originally Posted by JKim
I remember talking about the NSX here along time ago.

I argued that the NSX was a failure in the US market due to its lack of performance, poor selling numbers, and outrageous price.

That is still my contention today. If it was the most influential car in recent history...it sure didnt show it by its poor acceptance in the US market.
not really on either side here, but i don't think honda was accepted period when it came to anything performance wise 15 years ago in the U.S. People who could afford to drop that much on a sports car bought cars that had a rep. (vipers,testorosa,,etc.)

But id be willing to bet sales were ok in Japan.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 10:29 AM
  #95  
JKim's Avatar
JKim
Hating...
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 0
From: In the NSX
JKim has disabled reputation
Default Re: Acura NSX

Originally Posted by Chris@SCAutos
not really on either side here, but i don't think honda was accepted period when it came to anything performance wise 15 years ago in the U.S. People who could afford to drop that much on a sports car bought cars that had a rep. (vipers,testorosa,,etc.)

But id be willing to bet sales were ok in Japan.
I don't know how it did in the global market. I just know that it failed miserably in the U.S.

Here is a couple of observations that i have. They are just opinions so take them for what their worth.

I can think of two reasons why Honda didn't drastically change the NSX during the 15 years of its production run. 15 years is a LONGGG time for any car to remain practically unchanged. 1) they got it right the first time. It was selling like hotcakes the way it is and so they kept it the way it is. or 2) It wasn't the sucess that honda wanted. Honda didn't see any profit from r&d into the nsx and so they were simply dragging it as long as possible.

Again, im not the CEO of Honda so take these opinions for what its worth. But i know that profit drives every automobile company. Period. If Honda wasn't making any money from the NSX, they would have dumped it along time ago....or keep it basically unchanged until they do have the resources to make a new one.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 10:47 AM
  #96  
soulDistortion's Avatar
soulDistortion
Patron
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,611
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
soulDistortion soulDistortion soulDistortion soulDistortion soulDistortion soulDistortion soulDistortion soulDistortion soulDistortion soulDistortion soulDistortion
Default Re: Acura NSX

I always accounted the low sales to the insanely stupid price tag they put on it when it first came out. That, coupled with people's perceptions of a japanese "exotic" sports car at the time really hurt them in the US.

Did it fail in the US market? Yeah, pretty much. But sales aside, it's still a hell of a car, performance-wise. If it wasn't still a fundamentally good car, I doubt Honda would have kept it essentially the same in their home market for as long as they did.

I'm sure Honda sold more than enough Accords in the US to float anything they lost with the NSX, so it's a tad moot.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 10:54 AM
  #97  
Black Nugget's Avatar
Black Nugget
round ii
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,385
Likes: 0
From: my own hell
Black Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Acura NSX

Perhaps someone *cough* Dave22 *cough can comment here if I am incorrect, but Honda didn't produce the NSX to be a great selling machine and make them a huge profit. They built it to say, "Here you go Ferrari, we can do it too... and better!".

Sort of like Toyota's production of the Prius. Did you know that it costs Toyota more to produce the Prius than it cost the average consumer to buy it? Do you know why? Marketing...
Toyota builds the greenest vehicles on the planet. How many commercials do you hear for Toyota when they don't mention gas mileage? I bet not a single one.

Ultimately Honda built one of the greatest sports cars of all time. Peoples complaints, as I initially posted will always remain the same : it's outdated, overpriced, and underpowered.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:07 AM
  #98  
Black Nugget's Avatar
Black Nugget
round ii
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,385
Likes: 0
From: my own hell
Black Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond reputeBlack Nugget has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Acura NSX

Granted, like JKim I am not the CEO of Honda. That is just my understanding. In the early 90's no one really looked at Honda thinking that they would be able to compete with Ferrari in the supercar market. They proved they could do it.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:18 AM
  #99  
Flite's Avatar
Flite
HHIC
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 19,087
Likes: 0
Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite
Default Re: Acura NSX

The NSX was never supposed to be profitable for Honda. It was a showcase.
Old Apr 28, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #100  
Ioxus's Avatar
Ioxus
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Ioxus Ioxus Ioxus Ioxus Ioxus Ioxus Ioxus Ioxus Ioxus Ioxus Ioxus
Default Re: Acura NSX

Originally Posted by JKim
I remember talking about the NSX here along time ago.

I argued that the NSX was a failure in the US market due to its lack of performance, poor selling numbers, and outrageous price.

That is still my contention today. If it was the most influential car in recent history...it sure didnt show it by its poor acceptance in the US market.
The Supra sold poorly in the US as well, does that make it a less than desireable car?

The NSX set a new bar for the supercar industry, but was a bit expensive for the average consumer, and those looking for a supercar went with one with name recognition. It's the same story for the Supra, and honestly despite the fact that the new GT-R beats the Porsche 911 in just about every category it will not sell well in the US either. Every ricer kid drooling over one will never, ever be able to afford one. Those who can will mostly just buy the Porsche anyway.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:53 AM.