I introduce the Honda V8... splooge
Originally Posted by Shawn
Since when?
http://www.crxsi.com/specs.htm
That website there lists the best time as a 16.2. Considering all america got was a CRX Si with a d16 as the best motor ( a whopping 108hp, woop dee doo), you're completely incorrect. If you wanna get technical, in 1987, CARS magazine got a completely stock LX mustang to run a 13.8@100mph.
Who gives a shit how small your motor is. If you show me a 14 second timeslip beating a 20 year old mustang, i'm not gonna care. Hell 13 seconds isnt fast, so chances are I wont care about that either.
http://www.crxsi.com/specs.htm
That website there lists the best time as a 16.2. Considering all america got was a CRX Si with a d16 as the best motor ( a whopping 108hp, woop dee doo), you're completely incorrect. If you wanna get technical, in 1987, CARS magazine got a completely stock LX mustang to run a 13.8@100mph.
Who gives a shit how small your motor is. If you show me a 14 second timeslip beating a 20 year old mustang, i'm not gonna care. Hell 13 seconds isnt fast, so chances are I wont care about that either.
Originally Posted by Iceman05
any idea on the lifespan of that motor? i cant imagine a 590hp 4l motor lasting 150k+ miles....
Originally Posted by MattnTheHATch
Originally Posted by Shawn
Since when?
http://www.crxsi.com/specs.htm
That website there lists the best time as a 16.2. Considering all america got was a CRX Si with a d16 as the best motor ( a whopping 108hp, woop dee doo), you're completely incorrect. If you wanna get technical, in 1987, CARS magazine got a completely stock LX mustang to run a 13.8@100mph.
Who gives a shit how small your motor is. If you show me a 14 second timeslip beating a 20 year old mustang, i'm not gonna care. Hell 13 seconds isnt fast, so chances are I wont care about that either.
http://www.crxsi.com/specs.htm
That website there lists the best time as a 16.2. Considering all america got was a CRX Si with a d16 as the best motor ( a whopping 108hp, woop dee doo), you're completely incorrect. If you wanna get technical, in 1987, CARS magazine got a completely stock LX mustang to run a 13.8@100mph.
Who gives a shit how small your motor is. If you show me a 14 second timeslip beating a 20 year old mustang, i'm not gonna care. Hell 13 seconds isnt fast, so chances are I wont care about that either.
Originally Posted by MattnTheHATch
CRX's in japan you dumb bastard.
If I make far more hp/L than most but my car is still running mid 14's, then what has that gotten me? Well kudos to my oh-so-very impressive ratio but my car is still at the end of the pack.
I guess that individual has to have something at the end of the day to make himself feel better about being so slow.
Anyways, isnt the utterly obvious bottom line - whatever is fast should be respected? It doesnt really matter how you got there weather it be displacement, power adder, 283847 HP/L, etc.
Originally Posted by montman
Haha, the true sign of an intelligent debate, name calling.
If I make far more hp/L than most but my car is still running mid 14's, then what has that gotten me? Well kudos to my oh-so-very impressive ratio but my car is still at the end of the pack.
I guess that individual has to have something at the end of the day to make himself feel better about being so slow.
Anyways, isnt the utterly obvious bottom line - whatever is fast should be respected? It doesnt really matter how you got there weather it be displacement, power adder, 283847 HP/L, etc.
If I make far more hp/L than most but my car is still running mid 14's, then what has that gotten me? Well kudos to my oh-so-very impressive ratio but my car is still at the end of the pack.
I guess that individual has to have something at the end of the day to make himself feel better about being so slow.
Anyways, isnt the utterly obvious bottom line - whatever is fast should be respected? It doesnt really matter how you got there weather it be displacement, power adder, 283847 HP/L, etc.
Originally Posted by MattnTheHATch
CRX's in japan you dumb bastard.
Originally Posted by MattnTheHATch
I try my best

Originally Posted by Shawn
Show me a timeslip from a bone stock CRX circa 1989 that ran a 14.9 or faster in the 1320 fucknut.
Originally Posted by spic
.. your best is pitiful.
Ummm.. a B16 in ANY Honda is good for high 13's. Duh.
Ummm.. a B16 in ANY Honda is good for high 13's. Duh.
thanks spic, preciate it






