Deal.

 

WoW, why didn't i think of that before...

How about you completely elimate the front, because you don't them anyways...and




I bet if you put a LS1 motor in one of those...it would be the fastest thing in the world.

 

Wheels going up isnt wheels going forward, which is useless from a racing standpoint. There's a reason the fast fast cars barely lift the wheels just enough to get the fronts to stop spinning. The ones that yank the wheels are usually limited in their by their class as to how they can set their suspension/chassis up.

 

the evo i listed said it had 1.5s for its 60ft time

 

It'd be really close.

 

Well whats your definition of a street car? I've seen numerous F bodys on true street tires (Falken Ziex's for instance) cut 1.7 and 1.8 60's with a manual transmission. AWD is cool and all if you dont know how to drive, and if you're racing on slick surfaces, but if you have the ability to put the power down, be it through driving or through a properly prepped track, then RWD will match AWD if the user knows how to harness it.

 

I know guys running 12's that are cutting 1.5's with RWD. With a 9 second slip, that should be in the 1.2-1.3 range, not 1.5. 1.5 is a horrible 60' time for a 9 second car.

 

Just trying to say that pulling the wheels in racing usually means the car is set up for weight transfer to increase traction.

 

Fuzion ZRi's son!

 

I don't think a 300hp T/A could cut a 1.5 either. Not on street tires.