Cycle whore thread

Subscribe
Mar 15, 2012 | 07:07 PM
  #12291  
Re: Cycle whore thread
My reaction to that post as I went down!

Spoiler
 
I think I'll get a dual sport to go with my cafe....
Reply
Mar 15, 2012 | 07:21 PM
  #12292  
Re: Cycle whore thread
My brother rode the new kawasaki 250 klx sf for his motorcycle test.

That thing is f'ing awesome.

Reply
Mar 16, 2012 | 03:06 AM
  #12293  
Re: Cycle whore thread
Quote: My brother rode the new kawasaki 250 klx sf for his motorcycle test.

That thing is f'ing awesome.

http://allmotorcyclepictures.com/wp-...250SF-side.jpg
I love those. I'd love one of those or a WR250X as a second bike.
Reply
Mar 16, 2012 | 06:31 AM
  #12294  
Re: Cycle whore thread
I think someone should buy my DRZ400:

http://norfolk.craigslist.org/mcy/2903496927.html


Reply
Mar 16, 2012 | 06:59 AM
  #12295  
Re: Cycle whore thread
You'd like that, wouldn't you ... -_-



I really need a connection with a ducati part dealer.




OH, one more thing! Repsol oil is damned expensive. I need a gallon of it for the Duc. 68 dollars plus shipping is the cheapest I can find it so far.
Reply
Mar 16, 2012 | 09:14 AM
  #12296  
Re: Cycle whore thread
Fair weather riders everywhere today! Jebus.

EDIT: 564 sounds like MotoGP right now, lol.
Reply
Mar 16, 2012 | 10:08 AM
  #12297  
Re: Cycle whore thread
Reply
Mar 16, 2012 | 01:55 PM
  #12298  
Re: Cycle whore thread
http://www.ducatinewstoday.com/2012/...tinewstoday%29

Reply
Mar 16, 2012 | 07:11 PM
  #12299  
Re: Cycle whore thread
Did my 600 mile oil change this evening...

You could see the milky sheen of tiny metal particles flowing through the oil pan.

Looked like a black pearl.
Reply
Mar 16, 2012 | 09:03 PM
  #12300  
Re: Cycle whore thread
This is kind of old, and I certainly apologize fr the quality, but it's a Ducati custom cruiser, I like it. I like it, a LOT.



More pics, and an article on it

http://www.duccutters.com/RogerAllmond-TechnoBobber.tpl


and another. . .





Personally, I would settle for something as simple as





ok. . .

or this. . .


Reply