Notices
Automotive Discussion Automotive talk that is not technical can be posted here. Posts must address the general population.

Acura NSX

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 06:42 AM
  #181  
Vanilla Face's Avatar
Vanilla Face
face is vanilla
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,243
Likes: 0
From: Yorktown
Vanilla Face Vanilla Face Vanilla Face Vanilla Face Vanilla Face Vanilla Face Vanilla Face Vanilla Face Vanilla Face Vanilla Face Vanilla Face
Default Re: Acura NSX

Originally Posted by S2K_Guy
That guy has the right idea, that's why I posted the picture.

They were built to compete with the late 80s and early 90s Ferraris and such... and it beat them.
And then the ferraris got better and the nsx didn't. I love the NSX, but for someone that hasnt driven one, I don't see the cost to performance ratio being very good.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 06:43 AM
  #182  
JKim's Avatar
JKim
Hating...
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 0
From: In the NSX
JKim has disabled reputation
Default Re: Acura NSX

15 years old. (which isn't really a criticism persay). It can actually be a compliment because the car still looks sexy today as it did at its debut.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 06:47 AM
  #183  
JKim's Avatar
JKim
Hating...
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 0
From: In the NSX
JKim has disabled reputation
Default Re: Acura NSX

And to the OP.

Here is the reality of it. If you really really want the car. Go for it. To some, cost is a non-issue when it comes to their satisfaction. To most, satisfaction is relative to cost. The NSX seems to be for the former and it does a good job of that at least. It satisfies its owners and makes them forget that its...underpowered, overpriced, and 15 years old.

Last edited by JKim; Apr 30, 2008 at 06:54 AM.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 06:55 AM
  #184  
S2K_Guy's Avatar
S2K_Guy
AKA: SHY_GUY
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,175
Likes: 0
S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy
Default Re: Acura NSX

F430 - $175-275k

4.3l V8 483hp
0-60 3.3sec
Top gear track - 1:22.9

NSX - $100k

3.2l V6 290hp
0-60 5.2sec
Top gear track: 1:31.6 (VERY VERY WET!)


the wet track made a difference of 10sec on the murcielago....
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 06:56 AM
  #185  
TheMuffinMan's Avatar
TheMuffinMan
Registered member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
TheMuffinMan TheMuffinMan TheMuffinMan TheMuffinMan TheMuffinMan TheMuffinMan TheMuffinMan TheMuffinMan TheMuffinMan TheMuffinMan TheMuffinMan
Default Re: Acura NSX

Originally Posted by MAD_DOHC
Um, I'd say the vast majority of every vehicle ever produce has shitty molded plastics on the interior. Even your precious imports, and especially your Accord.

Leather is poor grade in any vehicle that has it that isn't a luxury or high end car. Even some of those use poor leather.

I think you're missing my point.

Example:

Cobalt (friend has a new one) the dash has a silver trim piece that snaps into place and stretches across the entire front. There are HUGE ugly gaping holes where it doesn't line up. That's no where to be found in my car.

A hard plastic dash vs a foamy vinyl one

etc

And I'm not comparing leather in cars to leather in a house/clothing. Just within cars. Sit in a newer Ford's leather interior and it feels and looks like plastic. Sit in a newer Honda/Toyota's leather interior and it at least looks like leather and feels like leather.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 06:57 AM
  #186  
SpeedJunkie's Avatar
SpeedJunkie
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie
Default Re: Acura NSX

Originally Posted by S2K_Guy
the wet track made a difference of 10sec on the murcielago....
Let me start by saying I have no problems with the NSX...



You sounds like a ricer making an excuses for losing a race right there though.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 07:00 AM
  #187  
S2K_Guy's Avatar
S2K_Guy
AKA: SHY_GUY
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,175
Likes: 0
S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy
Default Re: Acura NSX

Well there was only a 1sec difference between the NSX and f430 on the Nurburgring....


7:55sec F430
7:56.73 NSX-R

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdGoF...eature=related

Last edited by S2K_Guy; Apr 30, 2008 at 07:03 AM.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 07:06 AM
  #188  
JKim's Avatar
JKim
Hating...
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 0
From: In the NSX
JKim has disabled reputation
Default Re: Acura NSX

Originally Posted by S2K_Guy
Well there was only a 1sec difference between the NSX and f430 on the Nurburgring....


7:55sec F430
7:56.73 NSX-R

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdGoF...eature=related

You do know that the NSX-R is like a 200k vehicle?

Last edited by JKim; Apr 30, 2008 at 07:08 AM.
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 07:14 AM
  #189  
S2K_Guy's Avatar
S2K_Guy
AKA: SHY_GUY
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,175
Likes: 0
S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy S2K_Guy
Default Re: Acura NSX

65000 GBP (that's 2002 GBP not 2008) So about 90k

http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/evoc...onda_nsxr.html
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 07:15 AM
  #190  
SpeedJunkie's Avatar
SpeedJunkie
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie SpeedJunkie
Default Re: Acura NSX

Originally Posted by S2K_Guy
Well there was only a 1sec difference between the NSX and f430 on the Nurburgring....


7:55sec F430
7:56.73 NSX-R

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdGoF...eature=related
Thats better, although you are talking about the NSX-R now.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:06 AM.