When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
ive got the car and driver article waiting. it speaks for itself. I wouldnt want to fork over that kinda dough and have the kind of problems they have had.
I assumed they'd be in there by no defending their almighty GT. Their excuse is that it's only 150K opposed to other cars in it's class even though 150K isn't something to just brush off.
agreed. i read an article in car and driver about how many problems there are with ford GT. i wouldnt consider that 'best exotic.'
you must think that Ferrari and Porsche are problem free to...
shit, Ferrari is probably the least dependable car on the road.
Originally Posted by ritz
I assumed they'd be in there by no defending their almighty GT. Their excuse is that it's only 150K opposed to other cars in it's class even though 150K isn't something to just brush off.
Too bad they're going for like 220+
no, my excuse is that the entire car went from thought to production in 15 months. (typically takes 4 year). And it has had a recall on a control arm that never actually failed. They're just playing it safe. Quit talking shit.
Last edited by Brock Obama; Jul 19, 2005 at 08:34 AM.
no, my excuse is that the entire car went from thought to production in 15 months. (typically takes 4 year). And it has had a recall on a control arm that never actually failed. They're just playing it safe. Quit talking shit.
Oh boo fucking hoo. No one's talking shit they're just telling the truth.