Notices
Automotive Discussion Automotive talk that is not technical can be posted here. Posts must address the general population.

Sequential Shifter, or H pattern

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 09:06 AM
  #11  
HatefulMechanic's Avatar
HatefulMechanic
The Pro to call.
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,172
Likes: 0
From: under cars.
HatefulMechanic HatefulMechanic HatefulMechanic HatefulMechanic HatefulMechanic HatefulMechanic HatefulMechanic HatefulMechanic HatefulMechanic HatefulMechanic HatefulMechanic
Default Re: Sequential Shifter, or H pattern

LENCO!!!!
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 10:13 AM
  #12  
Fabrik8's Avatar
Fabrik8
Racetracks
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,668
Likes: 0
From: How long is a piece of string?
Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8
Default Re: Sequential Shifter, or H pattern

Sadev, Ricardo, Quaife, Hewland, XTrac!
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 02:07 PM
  #13  
xian's Avatar
xian
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
xian is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Sequential Shifter, or H pattern

Originally Posted by Fabrik8
The shifting is only slower if the SMT system sucks. Ferrari's setups shift in 50-150ms (car/mode dependent), which is really fast. You're not going to beat that with your hand, I don't care who you are. Again, the MR2 setup is garbage, and really slow. Some of that is mechanical, some of that is the shift controller electronics. I'll take a nice, shift by hand sequential system. I'm not too into paddles, and most of the sequential manual trannies in the world don't have paddles, but most all of them are $$$ race trannies.
...and you're right, for the most part, however (and I could be wrong) my understanding is that the Ferrari and similar setups are designed solely for performance, but not longevity. So, that's crap from a daily driver standpoint*.

(*never met anyone who has a Ferrari as a daily driver though either.)

From my understanding, the MR2 SMT setup is probably the best for longevity and "decent" performance for its design; at least as compared to the typical auto-sport shift anyway.

I do know, the MR2 SMT utilizes the same tranny is the regular Manual Transmission cars, just with extra electronics and pumps. I'd venture to say that: "if someone took the time to hack it the right way, it could be substantially faster, but at the sake of reliability". I highly doubt it could compete with the Ferrari, etc setup, but faster than it currently is - I'm just not sure it'd be worth the effort.

But if we're talking performance only, the MR2 SMT is crap.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1PhatLS
Engine / Exhaust / Drivetrain
17
Jan 20, 2009 12:29 PM
Ick
Want to Buy / Trade ARCHIVE
0
May 18, 2008 02:23 PM
-Danimal
Parts ARCHIVE
2
Oct 9, 2007 08:23 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:51 AM.