neither is correct here mikey....



if i were to say none, that would be wrong. neither of the two, none of the above...




whats up with that coupey....

 

the car you have in your signature looks like a total piece of shit. everyone has those damn wheels. it sits really low to the ground... ie it probably rides like complete shit on the highway. im sure it sounds like shit too. my 68 year old german teacher drove a crx, and i see more fat old ladies driving them than i do any other car ever made. it has no torque, is worth nothing bluebook, is a target for vehicle theft, and in my opinion is a typical visor wearing, spikey gelled hair, pincushion 16 year old automobile.

with bolt-ons on the stock motor, flowFX's car can hit 11s. what's your fastest timeslip say? i have the same car as flowFX and it trapped 104 stock... hmm...


one vote for the f-body.

 

or

 

yeah 6 speed for me.......i hate crx's

 

I'd rather own the newer, nicer and more asthetically pleasing F-Body. To me, speed is not everything.

But your CRX is respectable.

 

No doubt about that. 12's NA on a Honda is very impressive. But how much faster can you go? Honest question.

 

i win bitches.








13's na on a prelude apparently isnt fast enough for the guys on twr however......but a spraying v6 or a girl in a v8 hitting 13.5's is something to celebrate....

 

big difference...


13's NA isnt shit when someone comes around being annoying and running their mouth like they have something. I'm sure if the owner of that certain prelude wouldnt have been an annoying troll on the boards and been a smartass to everyone he wouldve got plenty of praise on his new time.

 

p.s. how is this a 12 second car if it got beat by a low 13 second car?

 

hes fucking joking with you all.....



on top of that, all the shit you all talk, ive seen a few domestic owners meet him and completely switch attitudes when around him..