et or mph what wins a race?
Which is why I loved lining up against newer Rustang Slobra's, blower and all...they would destory me in the first 1/8th mile, but sure enough I would trip the lights by trapping a full 12 MPH+ faster. 
The mullets in the stands were less than pleased.

The mullets in the stands were less than pleased.
This is my point of view. ET wins races, always has and always will. Like I said before, some people on this board can't drive worth a shit and look at their trap because that shows them what their car is capable of. If you ran a 14.00 @ 110 your car should be capable of 12's, you can't drive obviously. Then you have people that run 12's @ 105 or something. That's usually a car that can just launch like a motherfucker.
For example. Raven02TA (M6 TA) ran a 12.76 @ 112. 99RamAir (A4 WS6) ran a 12.@108. Both had minimal mods, but the A4 was running a 3500 stall. However Raven did cut a 1.8 60' on nittos. I know I speak for LS1's that M6's trap higher than A4's do.
I dunno, but the answer to the question is obviously ET, whoever says that MPH wins races in an idiot. I do however enjoy watching a car go from 0' - 1320' and getting up to 140 mph.
For example. Raven02TA (M6 TA) ran a 12.76 @ 112. 99RamAir (A4 WS6) ran a 12.@108. Both had minimal mods, but the A4 was running a 3500 stall. However Raven did cut a 1.8 60' on nittos. I know I speak for LS1's that M6's trap higher than A4's do.
I dunno, but the answer to the question is obviously ET, whoever says that MPH wins races in an idiot. I do however enjoy watching a car go from 0' - 1320' and getting up to 140 mph.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






