Notices
Automotive Discussion Automotive talk that is not technical can be posted here. Posts must address the general population.

2006 Eclipse

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 04:23 AM
  #11  
Sean's Avatar
Sean
Webhosting Guru
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Yorktown/Grafton
Sean is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: 2006 Eclipse

probably because they weigh a smidge less than a herd of pregnant rhinos.

Curb weight(MT/ST): 3472/3538

and I think that is without the 10"inch sub in the rear.

Now add a driver and well, they are fucking heavy.

I didn't get to open up the one I test drove, but from what I am hearing they really start screaming around 3500-4000 rpms

haven't see a dyno graph yet.

I don't know if that would cause the discrepancy you are noticing.
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 04:34 AM
  #12  
Focal E46's Avatar
Focal E46
Jesus bilt my hotrod
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,882
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
Focal E46 is infamous around these partsFocal E46 is infamous around these partsFocal E46 is infamous around these partsFocal E46 is infamous around these partsFocal E46 is infamous around these partsFocal E46 is infamous around these partsFocal E46 is infamous around these partsFocal E46 is infamous around these partsFocal E46 is infamous around these partsFocal E46 is infamous around these partsFocal E46 is infamous around these parts
Default Re: 2006 Eclipse

Shitty gearing.
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 05:51 AM
  #13  
themacuser.org's Avatar
themacuser.org
Thread Starter
i got 5 on it
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,632
Likes: 0
From: voting booth
themacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these parts
Default Re: 2006 Eclipse

Originally Posted by XCELR8
I was being serious... You obviously don't have the intelligence to figure it out yourself do you? Hence why your worthless ass created an entire fucking thread for it.
dur yuk yuk. Now, if you don't fucking mind, explain how gearing would effect this car's 1/4 time/speed so much. To put it in terms you understand - I see Mustangs with 2.73's running mid 14's, and they sure as fuck aren't trapping over 100. -

Originally Posted by FutureProspect
Those times tell exactly how the car performs. It has alot of power but its slow as crap.
I know it has alot of power, and I know it's slow as crap. I was asking WHY it was slow as crap. With that weight, power, and setup, it should be a mid-high 13 second car. Supra's are slow because of horrid torque curves/boost lag, and generally shitty traction. This Eclipse has no problem with the torque curve (or turbo lag), and it's traction wasn't said to be THAT big of a problem.

Originally Posted by Sean
probably because they weigh a smidge less than a herd of pregnant rhinos.

Curb weight(MT/ST): 3472/3538
SHO's weigh roughly the same and the cars that are trapping 100ish are running 13.5-13.8's.
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 05:55 AM
  #14  
themacuser.org's Avatar
themacuser.org
Thread Starter
i got 5 on it
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,632
Likes: 0
From: voting booth
themacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these partsthemacuser.org is infamous around these parts
Default Re: 2006 Eclipse

Originally Posted by Qwiksillva
Take a pic of the '06 Eclipse, put your hand over the front half of the hood/headlights... it looks like the ass of a 350Z/G35. I think it's sorta weird. It's doesn't even look like an Eclipse anymore. I want to go test drive one of them to see how they feel.

Anyone seen the commericials for it yet? I think they should bring back the '03 Eclipse bitch with the weird arm dancing for shits & giggles.
Thanks for adding absolutely nothing useful to my thread. Once again, way to be on the ball.
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 06:02 AM
  #15  
Brock Obama's Avatar
Brock Obama
Srsly.
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo
Brock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these partsBrock Obama is infamous around these parts
Default Re: 2006 Eclipse

I'll be honest with you, I don't know, much like yourself and was only make an educated guess. Maybe the first two gears inside the transmission are really high that doesn't allow for very decent acceleration until you get to third (and possibly) fourth gear that finally allows the car to speed up to a 100+ mile an hour trap, however, after the fact that the car has been dragging its feet for the first 1/8 or so. Kinda like the exact opposite of a AWD car at the drag strip. It could also have a horrid torque/horsepower curve. I don't know, they didn't teach us this in Redneck High School.
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 06:10 AM
  #16  
thebigone's Avatar
thebigone
I <3 Hot Moms
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Boring A$$ NoVA
thebigone has disabled reputation
Default Re: 2006 Eclipse

Its the 2005 not 2006 eclipse
And Xcelr8 has come the closest on the reason for the trap speeds, tall 1st and 2nd shorter 3rd 4th and 5th and a fairly tall final!!
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 06:15 AM
  #17  
Jay's Avatar
Jay
VR-4ever
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,708
Likes: 0
From: not in russia.
Jay Jay Jay Jay Jay Jay Jay Jay Jay Jay Jay
Default Re: 2006 Eclipse

Originally Posted by spic
I hate Mitsubishi
.
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 07:44 AM
  #18  
Qwiksillva's Avatar
Qwiksillva
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake
Qwiksillva Qwiksillva Qwiksillva Qwiksillva Qwiksillva Qwiksillva Qwiksillva Qwiksillva Qwiksillva Qwiksillva Qwiksillva
Default Re: 2006 Eclipse

Originally Posted by spic
Thanks for adding absolutely nothing useful to my thread. Once again, way to be on the ball.
Anytime.
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 07:54 AM
  #19  
Fat Nick's Avatar
Fat Nick
Registered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 0
From: Williamsburg
Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick
Default Re: 2006 Eclipse

I think they still will be slugs, take a second off of it and 15's are more than likely where they will be. Magazines always lie, especially about a new car.
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 09:46 AM
  #20  
JKim's Avatar
JKim
Hating...
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 0
From: In the NSX
JKim has disabled reputation
Default Re: 2006 Eclipse

well its probably all topend no lowend.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:56 AM.