horsepower wars
Originally Posted by sucka306
well lets race there fairy boy. ill have that thingy called lsd on friday too.
fuck yeah.
i hope we are not swapping out your tranny tommorrow night.
Originally Posted by spkr_diy
Whoever said torque was a better meter of a cars potential than horsepower needs a lesson in physics. You could have a motor with 1,000 ft-lb of torque that could barely even move a car, if that torque was generated only at extremely low rpm (like 50-100 rpm). On the other hand, a car with 1,000 hp is gonna fly, no matter what rpm it generates that power at, you can find a gearset to make use of it. Using a single number is woefully inadequate, but if you have to use only one number, us horsepower. Graphs are much better than numbers though.
Personally, I like high rpm's as an answer to producing horsepower more than displacement, because it allows for smaller engines, which can be positioned for a low center of gravity and low moment of inertia. None of that has much to do with running a 1/4 mile though.
Personally, I like high rpm's as an answer to producing horsepower more than displacement, because it allows for smaller engines, which can be positioned for a low center of gravity and low moment of inertia. None of that has much to do with running a 1/4 mile though.
do you even know where horsepower comes from?
Originally Posted by XCELR8
ummm...
do you even know where horsepower comes from?
do you even know where horsepower comes from?
Originally Posted by greygti
American horsepower? It comes from the leftover horsepower from the europeans. We gotta share with y'all too.
Originally Posted by ritz
Well I'm glad you took a hit and gave me more than you have.


We're stingy with y'all though. We get 250 from a tiny little 6cyl. and all GM could bargin for was 305-320 from a massive 5.7l. What can I say, you owe me for your car Joe.
Last edited by Corey; Jun 27, 2005 at 04:47 PM.







