Turbo or Supercharger
Me and my freinds have had so many arguments over this crap when we were all done the result was power for a honda = turbo. reliability and deacent power =supercharger. if you are broke and scraping to buy forced induction you better go supercharger. endo story
Why does everyone say that turbo setups aren't reliable? What are people doing that's so wrong that makes them say that? I think you have to try hard to have turbo related problems, unless you're taking sketchy used parts of of other cars with high mileage, etc., and then trying to push them over the limit of what the parts are capable of. The only reliability problems you'll have is if it's installed stupidly, just like anything else. I don't buy into the "superchargers are more reliable" argument.
Last edited by Fabrik8; Feb 13, 2006 at 09:33 AM.
Originally Posted by smooshie butt
I'm curious as to why you people think that a turbo that doesnt fully spool until 4000 rpm is a quick spooling turbo. Thats a shitload of lag.
I've put a supercharged motor into my fiero (3800). If you do the job right the first time, both are just as easy to install. Superchargers will tend to be a little more of an expensive endeavor. Superchargers give you instantaneous response where as turbos take a second or two to spool. That being said, provided you don't have a rediculously oversized turbo, it doesn't take a huge amount of time to spool. Also on a note, superchargers are MUCH less efficient, plain and simple. Any 3800 Person can attest to this. The Eaton M90 that comes on our motors with a 3.4" Pulley are good for 280HP. Replace the SC with a custom manifold and a Turbo, you're good for 350HP on the same boost. Theres just more of a parasitic loss on mechanically spinnging the supercharger. . .
Even being biased to superchargers for your application I vote turbo.
Even being biased to superchargers for your application I vote turbo.
Originally Posted by RandomTask
I've put a supercharged motor into my fiero (3800). If you do the job right the first time, both are just as easy to install. Superchargers will tend to be a little more of an expensive endeavor. Superchargers give you instantaneous response where as turbos take a second or two to spool. That being said, provided you don't have a rediculously oversized turbo, it doesn't take a huge amount of time to spool. Also on a note, superchargers are MUCH less efficient, plain and simple. Any 3800 Person can attest to this. The Eaton M90 that comes on our motors with a 3.4" Pulley are good for 280HP. Replace the SC with a custom manifold and a Turbo, you're good for 350HP on the same boost. Theres just more of a parasitic loss on mechanically spinnging the supercharger. . .
Even being biased to superchargers for your application I vote turbo.
Even being biased to superchargers for your application I vote turbo.
Originally Posted by smooshie butt
Thats because you never fixed what was wrong with it in the first place jackass.
just the tranny and oil lines being ******rigged






