Anybody wanna see a ship sink?
Originally Posted by dave22
Sure. People have been killed in every kind of car. Can you find Proof that Honda knowingly released a deadly product? Or GM? Or Chrysler? Or Toyota? Or Yugo?
Does this mean every auto maker has released a deadly product? I think it does.
Originally Posted by dave22
Did the test drivers flip that Jeep hundreds of times before the first one was ever produced? Did Jeep know it would flip like that and make the concious decision to produce it anyway, knowing its customers would die?
Originally Posted by NFCstang
I feel quite certain that if you were to look at any SUV you'll find higher roll over rates then any car.
Does this mean every auto maker has released a deadly product? I think it does.
Does this mean every auto maker has released a deadly product? I think it does.
Originally Posted by dave22
Sure. People have been killed in every kind of car. Can you find Proof that Honda knowingly released a deadly product? Or GM? Or Chrysler? Or Toyota? Or Yugo?

Originally Posted by dave22
The Firestone thing was always a bullshit scapegoat from Ford. None of those tires were ever found to be defective. But they complied anyway and they're stronger now because of it.
Originally Posted by NFCstang
I feel quite certain that if you were to look at any SUV you'll find higher roll over rates then any car.
Does this mean every auto maker has released a deadly product? I think it does.
Does this mean every auto maker has released a deadly product? I think it does.

Can you find any other manufacturer that makes the decision to go ahead with a product when proof is shown that a minor redesign will save many many lives?
And what of the Pinto? It never rolled over. It just exploded. Ford knew it would explode before the first one rolled off the line. But they decided that settling wrongful death lawsuits out of court would be cheaper than spending ~50 cents per Pinto to fix it before anyone died. The fact that that plan blew up in their face (
) makes it pretty puzzling that they did almost the same exact thing at least two more times.
Here's some info
http://www.rolloverlawyer.com/jeep/index.htm
Make sure to look at the 2nd paragraph
http://www.rolloverlawyer.com/suzuki_samurai.htm
Here's a good one...GMC building a truck rather then spending $8 to fix a problem
http://consumerlawpage.com/article/gastank4.9bil.shtml
It's not that I think that Ford wasn't wrong. It's just he's trying to protray Ford as teh "Evil Empire" when other auto makers have done the same shit.
http://www.rolloverlawyer.com/jeep/index.htm
Make sure to look at the 2nd paragraph
http://www.rolloverlawyer.com/suzuki_samurai.htm
Here's a good one...GMC building a truck rather then spending $8 to fix a problem
http://consumerlawpage.com/article/gastank4.9bil.shtml
It's not that I think that Ford wasn't wrong. It's just he's trying to protray Ford as teh "Evil Empire" when other auto makers have done the same shit.






