Notices
Automotive Discussion Automotive talk that is not technical can be posted here. Posts must address the general population.

Why do the majority of you prefer a slower car for your money?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 01:58 PM
  #341  
Fat Nick's Avatar
Fat Nick
Registered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 0
From: Williamsburg
Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick
Default Re: Why do the majority of you prefer a slower car for your money?

Originally Posted by MORE IMPATIENT
because its fun to beat up on domestic cars. i mean come on now. you can buy a stock hatchback for 3k, put a swap in it for 2500-3k, turbo it for less than 2 and whomp the living hell out of any mustang or camaro your gonna get for that price.

if i did buy a domestic it would be a vette(which i can never afford), or one of the newer trans am, i love the way those cars look but in my mind american cars lack the styling that most imports have. besides the vette and viper.
What the hell is stylish about a Honda Civic?!?!?!?
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 02:02 PM
  #342  
90 hatch's Avatar
90 hatch
square1motorsports
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Newport News
90 hatch is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Why do the majority of you prefer a slower car for your money?

Originally Posted by 99formulam6
ha. ive already explained what happened, and offered to race him and you whenever you want. he cant, and you wont....so, come to me when you are ready.

/internet racing
My car is up and running, finally. I have a similiar setup to what MP5 has, just on less boost. I will be out this weekend. If you want some, come get some.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 02:04 PM
  #343  
99formulam6's Avatar
99formulam6
its not a trans am..
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
From: in front of HISSN...
99formulam6 99formulam6 99formulam6 99formulam6 99formulam6 99formulam6 99formulam6 99formulam6 99formulam6 99formulam6 99formulam6
Default Re: Why do the majority of you prefer a slower car for your money?

ill be out too....just look for the car.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 02:28 PM
  #344  
ws6formula50's Avatar
ws6formula50
Registered Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Mustang/Yukon, OK
ws6formula50 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Why do the majority of you prefer a slower car for your money?

Originally Posted by MORE IMPATIENT
because its fun to beat up on domestic cars. i mean come on now. you can buy a stock hatchback for 3k, put a swap in it for 2500-3k, turbo it for less than 2 and whomp the living hell out of any mustang or camaro your gonna get for that price.
.
Thats crap, I have run plenty of turbo Hondas (and others) in my Z28, and have lost to 1. MAYBE, if the people building these things would do it right, there are a few that are, people wouldnt ask questions like this. I have spanked the living sh1t out of every boosted Honda I have run, with the exception of 1. I just havent seen the reason for all the work involved to turbo and swap it and they still run 13's if the are lucky. I can def see the insurance reason, but I def think that it is more of the personal preference. I know there is a couple on here that could run with my Buick, but line up most any F Body on this board with the AVERAGE boosted Honda (or other import that had boost added) and it doesnt stand a snowballs chance in hell. My Z28 had $425 in perf parts and put down 325/340 at the wheels.

Flame away.....just my .02

Old Dec 1, 2005 | 02:28 PM
  #345  
MP5's Avatar
MP5
Team Rad Racing
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 0
From: HELLTRACK
MP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these parts
Default Re: Why do the majority of you prefer a slower car for your money?

Originally Posted by Fat Nick
What the hell is stylish about a Honda Civic?!?!?!?
you could as the same question about a mustang or gto. Its a matter of preferance. Why is that so hard to understand?
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 02:29 PM
  #346  
zx12guy's Avatar
zx12guy
Registered Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: Richmond
zx12guy is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Why do the majority of you prefer a slower car for your money?

Originally Posted by TheGoaT
a general average for them would be mid 13s. The 99-00s went hi 13s. Most of the 04s will hit low to mid 13s depending on the weather.
I concur, stock I ran 13.52 @102 in 70degree weather.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 02:36 PM
  #347  
MP5's Avatar
MP5
Team Rad Racing
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 0
From: HELLTRACK
MP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these partsMP5 is infamous around these parts
Default Re: Why do the majority of you prefer a slower car for your money?

Originally Posted by ws6formula50
Thats crap, I have run plenty of turbo Hondas (and others) in my Z28, and have lost to 1. MAYBE, if the people building these things would do it right, there are a few that are, people wouldnt ask questions like this. I have spanked the living sh1t out of every boosted Honda I have run, with the exception of 1. I just havent seen the reason for all the work involved to turbo and swap it and they still run 13's if the are lucky. I can def see the insurance reason, but I def think that it is more of the personal preference. I know there is a couple on here that could run with my Buick, but line up most any F Body on this board with the AVERAGE boosted Honda (or other import that had boost added) and it doesnt stand a snowballs chance in hell. My Z28 had $425 in perf parts and put down 325/340 at the wheels.

Flame away.....just my .02

we have already concluded that there are not as many fast imports on the streets as domestics. That does not mean it cant be done. I have a bone stock crv motor in my car now which can be had for $500 plus shipping, and i have a turbo kit on it which can be had for approx $2500 then add another $500-$1000 in tunning and thats where i am now. The problem with the majority of boosted hondas that are being seen is that they do not spend the money to have their car tuned correctly and either have a EMS system with just a base map and not dynoed tuned, or are running off an fmu and AFC controller.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 02:41 PM
  #348  
ws6formula50's Avatar
ws6formula50
Registered Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Mustang/Yukon, OK
ws6formula50 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Why do the majority of you prefer a slower car for your money?

Originally Posted by BigBake
You are tens times more likey to actually see an 8 second domestic on the street before you will ever see an 8 second import. One trip to TNT on a friday night confirms that theory, and that is just NN, how many 8 second imports are rolling around the News, on the street... NONE. Go to Richmond and it is even larger and yes you might see the one and only 8 second import out, but he rarely just shows up.

Case in point, not around here but in the Buick community, there are plenty of STREET driven 8 second Stage cars.....although the price tag is hefty.

http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...es/0503htp_tr/

read this and know, there are many more where that came from.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #349  
ws6formula50's Avatar
ws6formula50
Registered Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Mustang/Yukon, OK
ws6formula50 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Why do the majority of you prefer a slower car for your money?

Originally Posted by MP5
The problem with the majority of boosted hondas that are being seen is that they do not spend the money to have their car tuned correctly and either have a EMS system with just a base map and not dynoed tuned, or are running off an fmu and AFC controller.
yeah, thats what I was saying. I read as many pages as I could before almost dying of boredowm, so I may have missed a point or 2.


Forgot to add, the boosted Honda that kicked my arse, (after the 100mph mark, no torque) was S/C not turbo. Sorry bout that.
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 02:44 PM
  #350  
MA-HALF-E's Avatar
MA-HALF-E
Awesome.
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,483
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
MA-HALF-E MA-HALF-E MA-HALF-E MA-HALF-E MA-HALF-E MA-HALF-E MA-HALF-E MA-HALF-E MA-HALF-E MA-HALF-E MA-HALF-E
Default Re: Why do the majority of you prefer a slower car for your money?

I'm not sure if this has been covered...I don't have the time or patience right now to read through the 24 pages of (what I'm sure are mostly biased/stereotyped) opinions, but I have yet to attend an import event where the stands have been packed.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:48 PM.