sure is a nice night
please explain the truth to me. because its hard for me to look back when im in full tuck. i just know i hear no bikes near me when it happens, and you yourself obviously noticed something due to what you said the other night, and i havent changed how i ride, just what i ride.
please dont let this come down to me getting a video camera and finding someone in a car that can run 600's and show exactly what happens when this all goes down. because like i said, on many account from many a mouth the closest person to me that has been on a 600 has been jeremy, and even he was not 3 bikes behind. a tad bit farther than that. yet we ALL know jeremy will most likely beat rolling stock. (no offense but trust me i can tell)
and no one on here has beaten him.... so how you guys are closer to me than him, im lost.
rich you say the 636 is slower than the r6 when its all said and done, the r6 got beat by jeremy, the 636 sits rather close to stock from what i saw (couldnt tell what inched out in front).
now lets ladder that up. going off those facts.
R1 > by more than 3 lengths jeremy > r6 > 636 = stock (just saying equal from what i saw i dont know who won but it doesnt change the food chain so to speak)
but stock and the 636 are 3 bikes behind me............?
and no one on here has beaten him.... so how you guys are closer to me than him, im lost.
rich you say the 636 is slower than the r6 when its all said and done, the r6 got beat by jeremy, the 636 sits rather close to stock from what i saw (couldnt tell what inched out in front).
now lets ladder that up. going off those facts.
R1 > by more than 3 lengths jeremy > r6 > 636 = stock (just saying equal from what i saw i dont know who won but it doesnt change the food chain so to speak)
but stock and the 636 are 3 bikes behind me............?
please dont let this come down to me getting a video camera and finding someone in a car that can run 600's and show exactly what happens when this all goes down. because like i said, on many account from many a mouth the closest person to me that has been on a 600 has been jeremy, and even he was not 3 bikes behind. a tad bit farther than that. yet we ALL know jeremy will most likely beat rolling stock. (no offense but trust me i can tell)
and no one on here has beaten him.... so how you guys are closer to me than him, im lost.
rich you say the 636 is slower than the r6 when its all said and done, the r6 got beat by jeremy, the 636 sits rather close to stock from what i saw (couldnt tell what inched out in front).
now lets ladder that up. going off those facts.
R1 > by more than 3 lengths jeremy > r6 > 636 = stock (just saying equal from what i saw i dont know who won but it doesnt change the food chain so to speak)
but stock and the 636 are 3 bikes behind me............?
and no one on here has beaten him.... so how you guys are closer to me than him, im lost.
rich you say the 636 is slower than the r6 when its all said and done, the r6 got beat by jeremy, the 636 sits rather close to stock from what i saw (couldnt tell what inched out in front).
now lets ladder that up. going off those facts.
R1 > by more than 3 lengths jeremy > r6 > 636 = stock (just saying equal from what i saw i dont know who won but it doesnt change the food chain so to speak)
but stock and the 636 are 3 bikes behind me............?
I can only say that because Rolling Stock put about 3 or 4 bikes on the R6. And when I run him with the 636.. It is down to who gets the kick. but I think that the 636 has a little more available... it just doesn't seem to be as snappy as it should.
but when I do the tune... I dont think that the 636 will even come close... From what I understand.. when it is tuned right... my R6 is gonna be NASTY!!!
nah.. the 636 is faster than the R6 as it sits right now... from a 6th gear roll on.. the R6 has much much tighter gears and walks away from the 636... but going through the gears it looks like the 636 will kill the R6. The 636 has the same mods as the R6. I think that the 636 may have a clogged cat or something though... i have been told by a couple people that the header is starting to glow after a little bit or riding.
I can only say that because Rolling Stock put about 3 or 4 bikes on the R6. And when I run him with the 636.. It is down to who gets the kick. but I think that the 636 has a little more available... it just doesn't seem to be as snappy as it should.
but when I do the tune... I dont think that the 636 will even come close... From what I understand.. when it is tuned right... my R6 is gonna be NASTY!!!
I can only say that because Rolling Stock put about 3 or 4 bikes on the R6. And when I run him with the 636.. It is down to who gets the kick. but I think that the 636 has a little more available... it just doesn't seem to be as snappy as it should.
but when I do the tune... I dont think that the 636 will even come close... From what I understand.. when it is tuned right... my R6 is gonna be NASTY!!!
okay i gotcha, i was wondering if i had it right. i thought you used to say the r6 was faster but up top the 636 had the balls. my mistake.








In all seriousness this broke ankle shit sucks. Fuck you all.