Red NSX and White 300zx TT for sale on western branch blvd..
Originally Posted by KyleVA
And for dave22, if your serious I can probably get that info and pm you.
Here's a review from a guy who bought one on some website I googled. Only problem is that this one is an auto.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I purchased a 1992 Acura NSX (automatic) in 1995. I had traded a 1995 Corvette in on it and almost immediately, I knew I had made a mistake.
Let's start off with the some of the positive aspects of the 1992 NSX.
1) For the most part, it is as reliable as any other Honda (although, as you'll see later, mine was not.)
2) It's looks are superb, even after 10 years without an external design change.
3) It handles wonderfully. It kind of reminds you of a go-kart actually.
4) It has some nice amenities such as climate control, the option of a built in hands free cell phone (at least is was available in 1992), an optional 6 disc CD changer, and power everything.
5) It gets fairly good gas mileage.
6) It holds it's value fairly well.
7) You'll be the center of attention. (If that's what you want.)
Now for some of the negative aspects of the 1992 NSX, at least as far as I was concerned.
1) IT WAS SLOW!!! Do not buy this car if you are looking for something that will get you up to super-highway speeds quickly. Get a Viper for that. (See my Viper GTS review.) The little 3.0 L 6 cylinder engine is simply not enough for this automobile. They should have given it at least a 4L V8. I understand that the 5 speed manual is a little faster, but not much.
2) Everyone that drives up to you on the street wants to race. Unfortunately, most of them will be able to beat you. I was beaten by Chevy Impala SS's, Z28's, Trans Am's, Mustang Cobra's, Corvette's-----they all can out-accelerate this car.
3) The stock Yokohama tires are fairly expensive and do not last long at all! In fact, they are expected to last 10,000 miles or less.
4) Although it is supposed to be a reliable car, my NSX needed a new transmission at only 29,000 miles. Cost? $5,000 (And no, it's not because I abused it. I drove it like anyone would drive it after spending a LOT of money on it.....very gently.)
5) Modifications for increasing power are expensive. And if you should be unlucky enough to blow the engine, it'll run you well over $10,000 for a new engine. (I've heard that it was closer to $20,000 but I haven't verified that.)
6) Regular scheduled maintenance runs around $700.
7) The trunk is tiny.
8) The constant attention gets old. Every time I got gasoline, someone would come up and start talking about it and asking to sit in it. It's cool at first, but it gets old fast.
9) It is way too expensive for what you get. The Corvette, for example, offers more power, more features, better gas mileage, better sound (exhaust), and in my opinion, more fun for 1/2 the price. Heck, a brand new Viper GTS even costs less, and it's and expensive car!
I understand that the newer NSX's with the 3.2 L engine are more powerful and turn more respectable track times. If I were forced to buy another NSX, I would definitely get the 3.2 L engine. The 3.0 L engine is woefully inadequate.
Recommended
No
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I purchased a 1992 Acura NSX (automatic) in 1995. I had traded a 1995 Corvette in on it and almost immediately, I knew I had made a mistake.
Let's start off with the some of the positive aspects of the 1992 NSX.
1) For the most part, it is as reliable as any other Honda (although, as you'll see later, mine was not.)
2) It's looks are superb, even after 10 years without an external design change.
3) It handles wonderfully. It kind of reminds you of a go-kart actually.
4) It has some nice amenities such as climate control, the option of a built in hands free cell phone (at least is was available in 1992), an optional 6 disc CD changer, and power everything.
5) It gets fairly good gas mileage.
6) It holds it's value fairly well.
7) You'll be the center of attention. (If that's what you want.)
Now for some of the negative aspects of the 1992 NSX, at least as far as I was concerned.
1) IT WAS SLOW!!! Do not buy this car if you are looking for something that will get you up to super-highway speeds quickly. Get a Viper for that. (See my Viper GTS review.) The little 3.0 L 6 cylinder engine is simply not enough for this automobile. They should have given it at least a 4L V8. I understand that the 5 speed manual is a little faster, but not much.
2) Everyone that drives up to you on the street wants to race. Unfortunately, most of them will be able to beat you. I was beaten by Chevy Impala SS's, Z28's, Trans Am's, Mustang Cobra's, Corvette's-----they all can out-accelerate this car.
3) The stock Yokohama tires are fairly expensive and do not last long at all! In fact, they are expected to last 10,000 miles or less.
4) Although it is supposed to be a reliable car, my NSX needed a new transmission at only 29,000 miles. Cost? $5,000 (And no, it's not because I abused it. I drove it like anyone would drive it after spending a LOT of money on it.....very gently.)
5) Modifications for increasing power are expensive. And if you should be unlucky enough to blow the engine, it'll run you well over $10,000 for a new engine. (I've heard that it was closer to $20,000 but I haven't verified that.)
6) Regular scheduled maintenance runs around $700.
7) The trunk is tiny.
8) The constant attention gets old. Every time I got gasoline, someone would come up and start talking about it and asking to sit in it. It's cool at first, but it gets old fast.
9) It is way too expensive for what you get. The Corvette, for example, offers more power, more features, better gas mileage, better sound (exhaust), and in my opinion, more fun for 1/2 the price. Heck, a brand new Viper GTS even costs less, and it's and expensive car!
I understand that the newer NSX's with the 3.2 L engine are more powerful and turn more respectable track times. If I were forced to buy another NSX, I would definitely get the 3.2 L engine. The 3.0 L engine is woefully inadequate.
Recommended
No
Originally Posted by Assassin
Here's a review from a guy who bought one on some website I googled. Only problem is that this one is an auto.
The engine in the automatic has less horsepower because the 4 speed tranny couldn't handle much more than 250hp. The automatic was pretty much made for someone who wanted the looks and nothing else.
1) IT WAS SLOW!!!

2) Everyone that drives up to you on the street wants to race. Unfortunately, most of them will be able to beat you. I was beaten by Chevy Impala SS's, Z28's, Trans Am's, Mustang Cobra's, Corvette's-----they all can out-accelerate this car.
3) The stock Yokohama tires are fairly expensive and do not last long at all! In fact, they are expected to last 10,000 miles or less.
4) Although it is supposed to be a reliable car, my NSX needed a new transmission at only 29,000 miles. Cost? $5,000 (And no, it's not because I abused it. I drove it like anyone would drive it after spending a LOT of money on it.....very gently.)
Did he already forget about street racing "everyone that drives up to" him? Tranny failures are NOT common on these cars. Not even the weak-ass automatics.
5) Modifications for increasing power are expensive.
And if you should be unlucky enough to blow the engine, it'll run you well over $10,000 for a new engine. (I've heard that it was closer to $20,000 but I haven't verified that.)
6) Regular scheduled maintenance runs around $700.
7) The trunk is tiny.
8) The constant attention gets old. Every time I got gasoline, someone would come up and start talking about it and asking to sit in it. It's cool at first, but it gets old fast.
9) It is way too expensive for what you get. The Corvette, for example, offers more power, more features, better gas mileage, better sound (exhaust), and in my opinion, more fun for 1/2 the price. Heck, a brand new Viper GTS even costs less, and it's and expensive car!
I understand that the newer NSX's with the 3.2 L engine are more powerful and turn more respectable track times. If I were forced to buy another NSX, I would definitely get the 3.2 L engine. The 3.0 L engine is woefully inadequate.
Recommended
No
No
The NSX is obviously not for everyone. If you're like Brock or this toolbag please do avoid the NSX. You'd be more suited to something else.
look everybody i work at the car wash down the road i have washed both cars and drove the nsx
they are both 5 spd the ttz has HICAS suspension with 4 wheel steering twin turbo exhaust greddy tt hks intake.
he nsx is owned by a black dude who lets his girl drive it ALOT(skecht) but it IS a stick i have driven it my self the rims are 20s and kyle u measure rims u look at tires numbnuts so shut up
they are both 5 spd the ttz has HICAS suspension with 4 wheel steering twin turbo exhaust greddy tt hks intake.
he nsx is owned by a black dude who lets his girl drive it ALOT(skecht) but it IS a stick i have driven it my self the rims are 20s and kyle u measure rims u look at tires numbnuts so shut up
NSX was $27000-$27500.. 300TT was $9000.
der.
Originally Posted by njoyindaskyline
and kyle u measure rims u look at tires numbnuts so shut up
i love NSXs but if i was purchasing an early 90s car and spending $30,000 on it, it would have to be previously owned by jesus himself. and judging by the 20" rim talk... it's probably had the dogshit beat out of it.







