When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
i think you suffer from poor comprehension, since i said an STI comes with more HP base (which means STOCK) then an EVO, and has MORE DISPLACEMENT then an EVO which MEANS MORE TORQUE, which MEANS MORE BALLS, which MEANS BETTER FOR ANY PURPOSE,
You talk about my comprehension... i said show me a 500hp STi that is pretty much stock making 500awhp. Granted the Sti makes more power and torque than the Evo stock.... but im not talking stock... now am I? Im not saying it's not possible with an STi, im just saying an EVo has proven time and time again to make more power than the STi in the long run. Period. The engine design of the STi is great but it definitly has it's flaws, thats for sure.
Last edited by Hybrid AWD; Jun 16, 2005 at 02:37 PM.
i have.. it wasnt fun, always worried about breakin down on the road, and sucked in the traffic that plagues NOVA
Yeah I dont know how some people can actually drive in that shit... and i thought 64 E & W were bad near mercury. I was in the process of breaking down on 495 beside DC.... yeah that sucked big time.
yes this is true, but also how long has the 4g63 been around? almost what 15-17 years?
of course it would be easier to mod then the STI's motor which is less then 3 years old.
but i have driven both, and I prefer the STI, it felt like it had more Balls in Top end, and low end then the Evo, evo jus had less then the STI but that was it.