Notices
Automotive Discussion Automotive talk that is not technical can be posted here. Posts must address the general population.

Almost 400whp :)

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 07:26 AM
  #61  
Cobra4B's Avatar
Cobra4B
Fanboi
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 24,919
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B
Default Re: Almost 400whp :)

... your argument is irrelevant, the peak numbers are higher than anything I've seen in the vette/gto world for an LS2 motor with more mods (LT headers).
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 07:56 AM
  #62  
BigBake's Avatar
BigBake
OG Alumni
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
From: Arlington
BigBake is a name known to allBigBake is a name known to allBigBake is a name known to allBigBake is a name known to allBigBake is a name known to allBigBake is a name known to all
Default Re: Almost 400whp :)

Originally Posted by Cobra4B
... your argument is irrelevant, the peak numbers are higher than anything I've seen in the vette/gto world for an LS2 motor with more mods (LT headers).

Yet your argument is also, we have had LS1's laydown 340+ RWHP bone stock and have seen bolt-on cars get as high 380rwhp. Many factors play into how the dyno interprets power, also the condition of the car when placed upon the dyno. A car that has been recently driven has warmer fluids throughout the drivetrain and typical has less parasitic power loss for instance. Colder intake and warm coolant temps produce more power output on these cars. Maybe even a looser tolerance build from the factory. But to say that there is no way he laid down the number is a completely wrong statement. He did lay down the numbers. Going to another dyno does not make your statement valid, because now different conditions will exist both for vehicle and dyno.
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 07:59 AM
  #63  
Fat Nick's Avatar
Fat Nick
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 0
From: Williamsburg
Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick
Default Re: Almost 400whp :)

Well to prove all I have Blown97 over on SCR and TWR getting me one free dyno pull on Steen's dynojet to see. I would like to prove my car makes what it makes once and for all.
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 08:00 AM
  #64  
Fat Nick's Avatar
Fat Nick
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 0
From: Williamsburg
Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick
Default Re: Almost 400whp :)

Originally Posted by WillSol
Hmmm... Im looking at a 2004 GTO today thats down in VA Beach.
I couldnt get any dealerships to go under 30gs for a new one.
A new one you really will be hard to get under $30k. But a used 04 you could get for around 21-22k.
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 08:01 AM
  #65  
Fat Nick's Avatar
Fat Nick
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 0
From: Williamsburg
Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick
Default Re: Almost 400whp :)

Originally Posted by BigBake
Go with a 228 to 232 duration and stay at a 114 LSA, you will be amazed how tame it will be, the 224 will not be enough, it was designed with a 346 in mind. With a 112 LSA you will have to spin the motor higher to get the most out of it. Trust me, I run a T-Rex in a 383, and it is tame compared to a 346 engine with the same cam.
Sweet, I was just comptemplating getting that cam due to the fact quite a few guys on the GTO forums are running them. If I go bigger, that would mean more power correct?
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 08:03 AM
  #66  
Cobra4B's Avatar
Cobra4B
Fanboi
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 24,919
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B
Default Re: Almost 400whp :)

I'd really like to see what it lays down w/ proper correction factors. It is possible that you have a factory freak, but again the numbers are substantially higher than other cars w/ an intake, catback and tuning.
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 08:07 AM
  #67  
montman's Avatar
montman
Biding time
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 0
From: Watching the Redskins win one?
montman is infamous around these partsmontman is infamous around these partsmontman is infamous around these partsmontman is infamous around these partsmontman is infamous around these partsmontman is infamous around these partsmontman is infamous around these partsmontman is infamous around these partsmontman is infamous around these partsmontman is infamous around these partsmontman is infamous around these parts
Default Re: Almost 400whp :)

Originally Posted by KungFuHamster
i kinda agree with Brian....before i left VA, i had heard of some people getting their cars dynoed/tuned at DTP and seeing sick numbers, compared to others getting similar work done (not only in hampton roads but other places by very reputable tuners) and not seeing the same kind of results. oh well, dyno numbers are just that....#;s...its the number on the timeslip that matters most.
I totally agree with Ryan.

Anyways, a dyno should be a tuning tool, not get too wrapped up in what someone here or there put down with what. Perhaps a way to measure power gained if variables are consistent, same dyno is used etc.
I have personally seen a local car dyno X one day on a particular dyno, no changes made, and pull different numbers on another dyno.
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 08:13 AM
  #68  
Fat Nick's Avatar
Fat Nick
Thread Starter
Registered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 0
From: Williamsburg
Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick
Default Re: Almost 400whp :)

I just signed up over on the Corvette Forum, waiting on my e-mail. I C6 Vette's. Didn't know DTP had posted it over there as well, Frank said he'd post it over on TWR for me since everyone was saying bs to me putting down what I had previously. Shit, DTP can keep on posting it everywhere. I'd still like to find someone with the same mods making what I make. I really don't feel the dyno could be off due to what I put down bonestock.

But I drag race, so the dyno numbers aren't the only important thing to me, as I will like to see what this power has done for me come March at the track
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 10:34 AM
  #69  
rollinna65's Avatar
rollinna65
Registered Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: virginia beach
rollinna65 has disabled reputation
Default Re: Almost 400whp :)

Originally Posted by BigBake
Go with a 228 to 232 duration and stay at a 114 LSA, you will be amazed how tame it will be, the 224 will not be enough, it was designed with a 346 in mind. With a 112 LSA you will have to spin the motor higher to get the most out of it. Trust me, I run a T-Rex in a 383, and it is tame compared to a 346 engine with the same cam.
A cam with a 112 LSA peaks earlier than a cam with a 114 LSA.
Old Jan 23, 2006 | 11:52 AM
  #70  
calgone47's Avatar
calgone47
Registered Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: 17.18 @ 110.08
calgone47 has a reputation beyond reputecalgone47 has a reputation beyond reputecalgone47 has a reputation beyond reputecalgone47 has a reputation beyond reputecalgone47 has a reputation beyond reputecalgone47 has a reputation beyond reputecalgone47 has a reputation beyond reputecalgone47 has a reputation beyond reputecalgone47 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Almost 400whp :)

Good numbers, I just wish the GTO was a tad bit lighter.

anyways



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:01 PM.