You mad bra?

and yes, he is right about mitsubishis having better traction than hondas, since the whole point of this thread revolves around a fucking CIVIC and INTEGRA. If you really want to through the nsx, or crv on board go for it.....good power to weight jackass. Wasnt that your whole point? that a shitty 200whp honda could keep up with a higher power car, if the power to weight is equal? (which isnt all thats to the equation you butt fucking idiot.) like mentioned before, aero and traction are deciding factors.

In closing, you dont have a gimp leg to stand on, there are decent hondas out there, I personally know several.....that actually make power. and go single digit time slips. SO untill you can do that go sit in the special corner, and jack off to honda tuning, thinking you are awesome with 200whp.
Suck it.

 

i drive a shitty 130-150 HP HONDA and have kept up with plenty of higher powered, RWD cars.

I think that's pretty awesome.

 

yea, must be a rush.

 

It's not bad.

30mpg and enough power to kill Geo metros, older f150's, Jeeps (sometimes), some saturns get womped...


But honestly. For what it is, it's not bad.

 

Last time I took my car for a road trip, it got 32mpg and was making 530whp.

Cant complain here either.

 

I dont mind hondas, I was just bored and felt like picking on a idiot, he has been alot of fun.

 

32mpg.... HIGHWAY.

I'm making 30 beating on it, driving in the city, and some highway.

Who's the idiot

 

No, 32 mixed, from here to cville (70 miles) then around town there and back here for a couple days.


the idiot is madsteel or something, I cant remember his name.

 

Mostly based on this quote, and a couple others he edited after being called out on, to try and save face.

 

Its just really funny when honda guys talk shit, and pull excuses out during bench racing. There are a handful of cars on this site that would give me a good run, most being from richmond and have turbo ls1's.

So yea, I get bored and pick on retards. what of it?