Scion
Atheist.
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 0
From: MD
Re: Scion
Apples and oranges. Damn, does your car suck that bad that you gotta compare a V8 against a stock grocery getter? Shit, my Z was a V6 and pretty fucking quick but the only 4cylinders I compared them against were the seriously built ones, a couple of which could beat me. I now see the root of your need to dog other cars. Purely pathetic.
Registered member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 0
From: uranus
Re: Scion
160 torque is not good. used to have a 5.0 so i know what good torque is. I was comparing it to the other toyoa engines which have none really. For example the 2zzfe in the GT-s Celcia. Htey are rated at 180 HP but only 120 tq. U see what im saying, no 160tq still sucks but its way better than other 4 cyl currently out by toyota.
Srsly.
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo
Re: Scion
Originally Posted by Skywalker
Anything under 250 lb/ft is pretty weak FOR A SPORTS CAR. This thread is about a 108hp econoBOX. I don't understand why torque is even being discussed here.
Originally Posted by hookedup96rolla
the Tc is gonna kick some ass once it gets some aftermarket support. It should have good torque too since its a 2.4 4cyl. I saw some #'s for it powerr wise and they were pretty good . I think it was around 180hp 160tq or so and w/ TeRD S/c that will go pretty good.
Registered Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Re: Scion
I think I just like slow ugly cars what can I say, like my non-running 86 VW Vanagon that I love... its looks!!
oh wait, I forgot to mention the ej20t thats sitting in my garage waiting to be swapped in
oh wait, I forgot to mention the ej20t thats sitting in my garage waiting to be swapped in
