Nov. 17th Little Creek autox Official thread
Cone Killer
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Dave, you car was probably the best car to have for the conditions.
long wheel base = predictable handling
auto = not alot of wheel spin
abs = braking without lock up (assuming you have abs)
I think I could have run a 1:02 if I will ever get around to fixing my shifter bushings (2nd gear was hard to find on 2 of my runs). Best was a 1:03.???
long wheel base = predictable handling
auto = not alot of wheel spin
abs = braking without lock up (assuming you have abs)
I think I could have run a 1:02 if I will ever get around to fixing my shifter bushings (2nd gear was hard to find on 2 of my runs). Best was a 1:03.???
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Va.Bitch
lightningd, those are some impressive times I was in awe when they announced the times.
I on the other hand didn't do as well in my rear drive, balding street tires...
1:23:?? and missed a gate
1:17:??
1:12:??
1:10:??
I basically improved about 5 seconds on every run but the last
-Rich
I on the other hand didn't do as well in my rear drive, balding street tires...
1:23:?? and missed a gate
1:17:??
1:12:??
1:10:??
I basically improved about 5 seconds on every run but the last
-Rich
Former 757'er
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Originally posted by RichRotorhead
lightningd, those are some impressive times I was in awe when they announced the times.
I on the other hand didn't do as well in my rear drive, balding street tires...
1:23:?? and missed a gate
1:17:??
1:12:??
1:10:??
I basically improved about 5 seconds on every run but the last
-Rich
lightningd, those are some impressive times I was in awe when they announced the times.
I on the other hand didn't do as well in my rear drive, balding street tires...
1:23:?? and missed a gate
1:17:??
1:12:??
1:10:??
I basically improved about 5 seconds on every run but the last
-Rich
Thread Starter
co driver
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
From: chesaintshittodopeake
Originally posted by 98sr20ve
Good job. Your times were unreal. I got a 106 something (can't really hear in my car). My car was hating the conditions. Enough of the excuses. God runs.
Good job. Your times were unreal. I got a 106 something (can't really hear in my car). My car was hating the conditions. Enough of the excuses. God runs.
Originally posted by Axelerate
I was unable to go. I had some family stuff to take care of, and plus the weather didn't make me miss it. This weekend though I am defeinetly going.
How many cars showed up?
Damn, Dave it looks like you did pretty good. Congragulations. I thought I'd be nice and let you take this event.
I was unable to go. I had some family stuff to take care of, and plus the weather didn't make me miss it. This weekend though I am defeinetly going.
How many cars showed up?
Damn, Dave it looks like you did pretty good. Congragulations. I thought I'd be nice and let you take this event.
buddy 
actually, we would have been really close on this course, there wasn't a lot of straights for you torque monster to rape me on. i was competing w/ the wrx which has 230+hp to get the idea. i wish you were there, maybe all 3 of us could have been making it a hell of a race.
Originally posted by Eric16v
Dave, you car was probably the best car to have for the conditions.
long wheel base = predictable handling
auto = not alot of wheel spin
abs = braking without lock up (assuming you have abs)
I think I could have run a 1:02 if I will ever get around to fixing my shifter bushings (2nd gear was hard to find on 2 of my runs). Best was a 1:03.???
Dave, you car was probably the best car to have for the conditions.
long wheel base = predictable handling
auto = not alot of wheel spin
abs = braking without lock up (assuming you have abs)
I think I could have run a 1:02 if I will ever get around to fixing my shifter bushings (2nd gear was hard to find on 2 of my runs). Best was a 1:03.???
my auto is a actually and electrical tranny, so it can be driven manually just w/out the clutch. it even says it in the owners manual heh. needless to say, i shift it. i do get a little bit of wheelspin when i'm leaning due to the open dif.
and no abs here, i locked 'em up plenty of times. even on the fastest run.
Originally posted by RichRotorhead
lightningd, those are some impressive times I was in awe when they announced the times.
-Rich
lightningd, those are some impressive times I was in awe when they announced the times.
-Rich
Last edited by lightningd; Nov 18, 2002 at 10:19 AM.
Who's this guy?
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake
1.08 somethin
1.06 somethin
1.05 somethin
1.05 somethin
if those cones didnt jump up at me on the last run, i was lookin at a 1.04 somethin. but 'sall good.
ftd for the guy's stationed there was a 1.13. and guess who set that.....the dodge ram.
1.06 somethin
1.05 somethin
1.05 somethin
if those cones didnt jump up at me on the last run, i was lookin at a 1.04 somethin. but 'sall good.
ftd for the guy's stationed there was a 1.13. and guess who set that.....the dodge ram.
old guy
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Suffolk, VA
Originally posted by RichRotorhead
lightningd, those are some impressive times I was in awe when they announced the times.
I on the other hand didn't do as well in my rear drive, balding street tires...
I basically improved about 5 seconds on every run but the last
-Rich
lightningd, those are some impressive times I was in awe when they announced the times.
I on the other hand didn't do as well in my rear drive, balding street tires...
I basically improved about 5 seconds on every run but the last
-Rich
Former 757'er
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Originally posted by roadRacer
Rich, Cool to see you are here. This is Calvin with the ugly silver GSLSE from VIR. Good to see you here.
Rich, Cool to see you are here. This is Calvin with the ugly silver GSLSE from VIR. Good to see you here.