blue newer body prelude
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Virginia beach
Re: blue newer body prelude
jeez people, you act like you are all driving ferrari's. mustangs are decent, same with ludes.
you are all forgetting the most important aspect. DRIVER!
a good driver will do good in a shitty car and vise versa. no car is "best"
you are all forgetting the most important aspect. DRIVER!
a good driver will do good in a shitty car and vise versa. no car is "best"
Srsly.
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo
Re: blue newer body prelude
Originally Posted by huntrcrker
ill make sure to make all future posts in spo for now on 
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: 757
Re: blue newer body prelude
Why is everybody gettin' so worked up...?
I mean, everybody on this board has different taste in cars. Owning a Mustang and owning a Prelude are totally different. If you can purchase a Mustang, you can afford a Prelude, or vice versa. Its' the chooser who decides what goes into the engine.
Both cars are nice in my opinion. I was looking into purchasing a Mustang GT, and a Prelude for my first car. Not for speed, but just in general because they were both nice cars. I just ended up choosing something else, what better suited my taste. There are TONS of cars who could lace me up, i'm not denying that.
I mean for ya'll to be fightin' over the fact that Mustangs can beat Prelude, and Prelude can beat Mustangs. Stock for Stock, is probably going to be a Mustang. I don't know what the Book says, but that is my assumption. Once you start adding aftermarket parts, its' who knows?. The Cobra, and the Mach1's, etc Those are put out for the racer enthuse'.
Out of the two cars, to me a Mustang could reach a higher limit thus of a Prelude.
Both are different cars, have different limits and had different goals in mind when being built.
*I'm not calling you out XCEL
If anyone feels like this is' bein' directed towards them in a shitty way, its' not.
I mean, everybody on this board has different taste in cars. Owning a Mustang and owning a Prelude are totally different. If you can purchase a Mustang, you can afford a Prelude, or vice versa. Its' the chooser who decides what goes into the engine.
Both cars are nice in my opinion. I was looking into purchasing a Mustang GT, and a Prelude for my first car. Not for speed, but just in general because they were both nice cars. I just ended up choosing something else, what better suited my taste. There are TONS of cars who could lace me up, i'm not denying that.
I mean for ya'll to be fightin' over the fact that Mustangs can beat Prelude, and Prelude can beat Mustangs. Stock for Stock, is probably going to be a Mustang. I don't know what the Book says, but that is my assumption. Once you start adding aftermarket parts, its' who knows?. The Cobra, and the Mach1's, etc Those are put out for the racer enthuse'.
Out of the two cars, to me a Mustang could reach a higher limit thus of a Prelude.
Both are different cars, have different limits and had different goals in mind when being built.
*I'm not calling you out XCEL
If anyone feels like this is' bein' directed towards them in a shitty way, its' not.
Last edited by LSProven; Oct 12, 2004 at 07:36 PM.
Patron
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 27,951
Likes: 0
Re: blue newer body prelude
No one brought upon that argument but GodsOther himself. It seems as though he trolls the board and waits for the right thread to hop on the "Mustang sucks" shit.
I really don't give a shit quite frankly, just letting you know.
I really don't give a shit quite frankly, just letting you know.