View Poll Results: Stock ITR vs Silvia
ITR



7
15.56%
Silvia



38
84.44%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll
Stock ITR vs Silvia
Originally posted by SOHC-T
yeah sure i think they were talking about this link http://video.specifiedspeed.com/typer-silvia.avi
yeah sure i think they were talking about this link http://video.specifiedspeed.com/typer-silvia.avi
Originally posted by Rguy
One of the advantages for the ITR is the shorter gearing and identicle HP. Yes, the ITR is blown away in torque which helps it on the launch (as the video REALLY shows) but the smaller turbo hurts the top end, where the ITR is nearly always at with the short gearing. The weights are nearly identicle. I basically see it as a slight advantage to the Silvia in an 1/8th mile race, with the ITR winning in a 1/4m race. This is concerning the red top silvia motor with 205Hp and 203tq.
One of the advantages for the ITR is the shorter gearing and identicle HP. Yes, the ITR is blown away in torque which helps it on the launch (as the video REALLY shows) but the smaller turbo hurts the top end, where the ITR is nearly always at with the short gearing. The weights are nearly identicle. I basically see it as a slight advantage to the Silvia in an 1/8th mile race, with the ITR winning in a 1/4m race. This is concerning the red top silvia motor with 205Hp and 203tq.
Originally posted by Rguy
You THINK. stop that. Stock for stock it wont. The silvia was made as more of an all around performing touring car. The R was made for the sole purpose of circuit racing and it WILL out handle a stock silvia. Again, show me proof otherwise. And about those drivers not being able to drive...lmfao.
You THINK. stop that. Stock for stock it wont. The silvia was made as more of an all around performing touring car. The R was made for the sole purpose of circuit racing and it WILL out handle a stock silvia. Again, show me proof otherwise. And about those drivers not being able to drive...lmfao.

And looking at those videos, the times for the silvia, its a s14!!, are slower then what they should be, and that being 400m shouldnt make that much of a difference. The difference between 400 meters and 1/4 mile is like, what 10ft?
The number show that the silvia will pull on the itr low end and top end, itr is outhorsed and out torqued, numbers dont lie!!
ITR vs. Silvia on a road track. Well honestly the silvia has the upper advantage. RWD vs. FWD. We all know fwd suffer from understeer, some ppl say the ITR is more "neutral" but then again its FWD(understeer), sure its more stable then a rwd. A comparasion that close depends all on the driver, both are good track cars.
Originally posted by Rguy
On a road course, FWD vs RWD matters much less than in drag racing.
On a road course, FWD vs RWD matters much less than in drag racing.
Ill enter some quotes here....from the USTCC.
1st. Gary Hutto BMW (RWD)
2nd. Gary Sheehan WRX (AWD)
3rd. Arsham Honda ITR ( FWD)
if it doesnt matter that much...then why is fwd 150 points behind the leaders?
i dont see any fast fwd in JGTC either...
Well if AWD and turbo is so great, why is a WRX behind a BMW?Lets take a look at some other race series then. In the Speed Touring Car Championships, between 1997 and 2001 ITR's have won 4 out of 5 championships. In 1998 they went 1 and 2. The year they didnt win the championship, they lost by 3 points but still went 2 and 3. Thats against many a RWD car such as BMW 328's with M3 engines. And, the chassis those guys are running in the USTCC is FAR older than either the WRX or BMW designs. Yes, thats a 9 year old chassis design with a VTEC system designed in 1989. That integra is 150 behind the leaders because of an older chassis and engine, not because of FWD. Of course the FWD doesnt help, but it can be overcome. If this was some sort of drag racing comparison with the WRX and BMW's, the ITR would be much much behind, hence my statement that FWD matters less in road racing.
Originally posted by Rguy
Well if AWD and turbo is so great, why is a WRX behind a BMW?Lets take a look at some other race series then. In the Speed Touring Car Championships, between 1997 and 2001 ITR's have won 4 out of 5 championships. In 1998 they went 1 and 2. The year they didnt win the championship, they lost by 3 points but still went 2 and 3. Thats against many a RWD car such as BMW 328's with M3 engines. And, the chassis those guys are running in the USTCC is FAR older than either the WRX or BMW designs. Yes, thats a 9 year old chassis design with a VTEC system designed in 1989. That integra is 150 behind the leaders because of an older chassis and engine, not because of FWD. Of course the FWD doesnt help, but it can be overcome. If this was some sort of drag racing comparison with the WRX and BMW's, the ITR would be much much behind, hence my statement that FWD matters less in road racing.
Well if AWD and turbo is so great, why is a WRX behind a BMW?Lets take a look at some other race series then. In the Speed Touring Car Championships, between 1997 and 2001 ITR's have won 4 out of 5 championships. In 1998 they went 1 and 2. The year they didnt win the championship, they lost by 3 points but still went 2 and 3. Thats against many a RWD car such as BMW 328's with M3 engines. And, the chassis those guys are running in the USTCC is FAR older than either the WRX or BMW designs. Yes, thats a 9 year old chassis design with a VTEC system designed in 1989. That integra is 150 behind the leaders because of an older chassis and engine, not because of FWD. Of course the FWD doesnt help, but it can be overcome. If this was some sort of drag racing comparison with the WRX and BMW's, the ITR would be much much behind, hence my statement that FWD matters less in road racing.

The reason why u think Honda is behind the leaders is because its a 9yr old chasis with a 14 yrd engine right?. and yes i agree, it is one of the contributing factors, though i believe the reason why they are even doing that Well and staying in 3rd place...is because that 9 year old chassis has had 9yrs of chassis and suspension tuning experience, as well as the engine. 14 yrs of aftermarket tuning experience is what keeps the Honda ITR among the top 3 competitiors.
as far as these races have gone...the fwd have been out classed by the rwd and awd setups (except for the audi). with the introduction of the dc5 chassis and the kseries engine ( both brand spanking new). i still dont see it competing with the rwd and awd layouts.
Originally posted by Rguy
The JDM ITR motor and red top silvia motor are different by 5 HP. I wouldnt call that "outhorsed". Pull on the top end?! Maybe you didnt see the video. Go watch again.
The JDM ITR motor and red top silvia motor are different by 5 HP. I wouldnt call that "outhorsed". Pull on the top end?! Maybe you didnt see the video. Go watch again.
I can't see why you'd still argue this, all the numbers on these cars point to the silvia winning hands down, the video means nothing. Video just shows that it actually does take skill to drag race, and even though you may own a fast car, doesn't mean it's fast while you're driving it.
Originally posted by FutureProspect
is because that 9 year old chassis has had 9yrs of chassis and suspension tuning experience, as well as the engine. 14 yrs of aftermarket tuning experience is what keeps the Honda ITR among the top 3 competitiors.
is because that 9 year old chassis has had 9yrs of chassis and suspension tuning experience, as well as the engine. 14 yrs of aftermarket tuning experience is what keeps the Honda ITR among the top 3 competitiors.
anyways, the silvia (s13) at least, should make less power to the wheels than an itr stock for stock, just because of rwd and the weight of its running gear, but it doesnt make the silvia less potent.
ps- 1st post





