500WHP Evo or 500WHP S2000... whats cheaper?
INTERNET PIMP
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Re: 500WHP Evo or 500WHP S2000... whats cheaper?
Originally Posted by Moriar
yes this is true, but also how long has the 4g63 been around? almost what 15-17 years?
of course it would be easier to mod then the STI's motor which is less then 3 years old.
but i have driven both, and I prefer the STI, it felt like it had more Balls in Top end, and low end then the Evo, evo jus had less then the STI but that was it.
of course it would be easier to mod then the STI's motor which is less then 3 years old.
but i have driven both, and I prefer the STI, it felt like it had more Balls in Top end, and low end then the Evo, evo jus had less then the STI but that was it.
then why is the EVO faster?
Smart Dumb cats
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Re: 500WHP Evo or 500WHP S2000... whats cheaper?
Originally Posted by Shawn
From what I've seen they're even. Larry ran a 13.0@103 bone stock in his STi.
Raw power
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Hampton
Re: 500WHP Evo or 500WHP S2000... whats cheaper?
If both cars had axactly the same power numbers, the S2000 would definately walk the EVO because it's a shit-ton lighter and rear wheel drive is easier to launch. And anybody who built a 500hp S2000 and wouldn't build the entire drivetrain (trans, readend, alxes etc) is just a moroon!
But to answer the original question, the EVO would have the cheaper build since it is closer to the 500hp mark and is already turbo'd.
But to answer the original question, the EVO would have the cheaper build since it is closer to the 500hp mark and is already turbo'd.
Srsly.
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo
Re: 500WHP Evo or 500WHP S2000... whats cheaper?
Originally Posted by F_bird
If both cars had axactly the same power numbers, the S2000 would definately walk the EVO because it's a shit-ton lighter and rear wheel drive is easier to launch. And anybody who built a 500hp S2000 and wouldn't build the entire drivetrain (trans, readend, alxes etc) is just a moroon!
But to answer the original question, the EVO would have the cheaper build since it is closer to the 500hp mark and is already turbo'd.
But to answer the original question, the EVO would have the cheaper build since it is closer to the 500hp mark and is already turbo'd.
wub wub wub wub
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,724
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Re: 500WHP Evo or 500WHP S2000... whats cheaper?
Originally Posted by XCELR8
AWD launches > RWD launches (assuming both cars have street tires)
Srsly.
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo
Re: 500WHP Evo or 500WHP S2000... whats cheaper?
Originally Posted by ZeRo_c0oL@work
Which one breaks first after equally hard launches though? I think AWD would be the first to break.
I would agree.
FUCKIN MAGNETS
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 22,585
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
Re: 500WHP Evo or 500WHP S2000... whats cheaper?
Originally Posted by F_bird
If both cars had axactly the same power numbers, the S2000 would definately walk the EVO because it's a shit-ton lighter and rear wheel drive is easier to launch. And anybody who built a 500hp S2000 and wouldn't build the entire drivetrain (trans, readend, alxes etc) is just a moroon!
But to answer the original question, the EVO would have the cheaper build since it is closer to the 500hp mark and is already turbo'd.
But to answer the original question, the EVO would have the cheaper build since it is closer to the 500hp mark and is already turbo'd.
FUCKIN MAGNETS
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 22,585
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
Re: 500WHP Evo or 500WHP S2000... whats cheaper?
Originally Posted by Moriar
LS1 or cobra's not everyone can afford the insurance on em,