View Poll Results: Is a vehicle that's ugly but fast still gay?
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 138. You may not vote on this poll
Ugly, but fast, still GAY?
Thread Starter
:Uses Ninja-Focus:
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: too.tree.too.tree.fow.
Ugly, but fast, still GAY?
Ok, so there's an on-going debate on cars that people post that are ugly as fuck, or the ugliness out-weighs the overall appearance of the vehicle, and they try to get you to see past the complete waste of time and money spent on the appearance of the vehicle, and realize how fast it is or draw your attention to the performance aspects of said vehicle.
So my question to VAD is.. if a vehicle is pro-dominantly ugly, but has decent quality mods under the hood and decently fast (12 sec 1/4 mile at least) is it still gay, or is the overall hideousness acceptable or tolerable given the performance of it? I say tasteful, genuine, rare mods and pretty quick if not shit-ur-pants fast is undoubtedly the Win overall.
So my question to VAD is.. if a vehicle is pro-dominantly ugly, but has decent quality mods under the hood and decently fast (12 sec 1/4 mile at least) is it still gay, or is the overall hideousness acceptable or tolerable given the performance of it? I say tasteful, genuine, rare mods and pretty quick if not shit-ur-pants fast is undoubtedly the Win overall.
Thread Starter
:Uses Ninja-Focus:
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: too.tree.too.tree.fow.
NA No V-tec D
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: d-series>k-series
Re: Ugly, but fast, still GAY?
f a vehicle is pro-dominantly ugly, but has decent quality mods under the hood and decently fast (12 sec 1/4 mile at least) is it still gay, or is the overall hideousness acceptable or tolerable given the performance of it? I say tasteful, genuine, rare mods and pretty quick if not shit-ur-pants fast is undoubtedly the Win overall.
<3
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,013
Likes: 0
From: Harlem, NY
(. )( .) & 8====>
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 13,460
Likes: 0
From: <====8&(. )( .)