Old Dec 1, 2005 | 02:53 PM
  #352  
Fat Nick's Avatar
Fat Nick
Registered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 0
From: Williamsburg
Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick Fat Nick
Default Re: Why do the majority of you prefer a slower car for your money?

Originally Posted by MP5
you could as the same question about a mustang or gto. Its a matter of preferance. Why is that so hard to understand?
Think about it from this standpoint though. A sports car/muscle car is meant to grab you attention with aggressive styling, exhaust rumble, etc.

A Honda Civic for example is meant to be a cheap economy car, not flashy or goregous no matter what you could do to it just bland imo. But another Honda, the S2K is flashy and pretty. And as far as they go I really like the looks of them, just not big enough or fast enough. I honestly think the main reason Hondas are modded is because of insurance. But full coverage on a Honda Civic is only $20 less a month than full coverage on my GTO which is rated 400hp and I'm 19. Go figure.

My insurance is on my own. My cars I've owned and insurance costs:

98 Dakota full coverage $197 a month
02 Sentra full coverage $202 a month
05 GTO full coverage $220 a month


And the most expensive obviously:

03 GT full coverage $268 a month

Last edited by Fat Nick; Dec 1, 2005 at 02:57 PM.