Notices
Tech Talk Anything technically related to your vehicle should be posted here. If you're looking to have work done, try one of the Regional Forums.

Turbo vs Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 05:22 AM
  #21  
beem3r's Avatar
beem3r
Thread Starter
Yamaha :) vrooom!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
beem3r has disabled reputation
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by Fabrik8
If you knew how much it costs to build a M3 engine for safe tuning at more than low boost, you'd be happy with low boost for a while I believe..
I agree haha i jsut want to hit low 13s m3 at 240hp. 6psi about 40-50 hp? i know it depends.....so im looking at almost 290 hp maybe more with mods of course
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 08:00 AM
  #22  
DecentCivicZ6's Avatar
DecentCivicZ6
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Lynchburg, Va
DecentCivicZ6 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by Fabrik8
So please explain what power over an RPM range has to do with power at a certain boost level. I'll wait.

oh i know about the rpm band..thats why i like exhuast driven spool time...rather than a belt fuck waitin for RPMS to increase to get boost..i want full boost from time my foot htis the floor..haha (lil lagg never hurt)

but seriously...say you have k20 turbo k20 s/c.... both 10psi...what RPM does it take the s/c car to get 10psi?? ive always thought it had to be at max rpm...since it driven by a belt. unless they use a BOV type thing to regulate how much boost goes in so they dont have to wind all the way out to reach 10psi???
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 09:30 AM
  #23  
Fabrik8's Avatar
Fabrik8
Racetracks
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,668
Likes: 0
From: How long is a piece of string?
Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8 Fabrik8
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Going back to the original question... Whether or not an engine can handle boost safely has nothing to do with what RPM that boost is achieved or what RPM range it stays at that level of boost.

Superchargers can reach full boost at full RPM, but it depends on how they're sized for a particular application. A smaller supercharger will not be able to flow enough at high RPM, which is why twincharging is such a fun advantage (the turbo picks up when the super starts to drop the ball)..
You have to realize there are different types of superchargers also, centrifugal units (Vortech) don't come onto boost until higher RPM. They're essentially belt driven turbos and have similar RPM-based characteristics. Roots or Eaton superchargers generate boost all the time at lower RPM because their displacement ratio is fixed. Like I said, it's down to sizing.

Last edited by Fabrik8; Jun 12, 2007 at 09:32 AM.
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 09:37 AM
  #24  
DecentCivicZ6's Avatar
DecentCivicZ6
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Lynchburg, Va
DecentCivicZ6 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Ah, i see. so in the end, i still love a turbo more. haha.
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 10:09 AM
  #25  
RandomTask's Avatar
RandomTask
Registered member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 0
RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

I'm going to re-iterate what on what Fabrik8 is saying. Its not necessarily about your compression ratio, rather its about the dynamic cylinder pressures. Its ALSO about reaching that limit in the most efficient way possible. For example, you might have a motor with an 8.0:1 that you can run say 20 lbs of boost. OR you can have the same motor with a 10:1 ratio and only run 12 lbs of boost. Now you need to consider ambiatic efficienies. On setup a (20psi) the turbo may be running at 62% efficiency, where as setup b (12psi) will be running at 76% efficieny. Superchargers (centrifugal style) usually max out around 80% efficiency peak. You're dealing with curves, NOT straight lines in forced induction. The goal is to match your needs/purpose, to that peak.

Last edited by RandomTask; Jun 12, 2007 at 10:56 AM.
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 10:21 AM
  #26  
Mid Atlantic Performance's Avatar
Mid Atlantic Performance
Registered Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Mid Atlantic Performance is a jewel in the roughMid Atlantic Performance is a jewel in the roughMid Atlantic Performance is a jewel in the roughMid Atlantic Performance is a jewel in the rough
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

all things being = a turbo will allways make more hp then a supercharger will.
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #27  
RandomTask's Avatar
RandomTask
Registered member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 0
RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask RandomTask
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by crazzylegs
all things being = a turbo will allways make more hp then a supercharger will.
LoL - god you people are so ignorant.
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #28  
DecentCivicZ6's Avatar
DecentCivicZ6
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Lynchburg, Va
DecentCivicZ6 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by RandomTask
I'm going to re-iterate what on what Fabrik8 is saying. Its not necessarily about your compression ratio, rather its about the dynamic cylinder pressures. Its ALSO about reaching that limit in the most efficient way possible. For example, you might have a motor with an 8.0:1 that you can run say 20 lbs of boost. OR you can have the same motor with a 10:1 ratio and only run 12 lbs of boost. Now you need to consider ambiatic efficienies. On setup a (20psi) the turbo may be running at 62% efficiency, where as setup b (10psi) will be running at 76% efficieny. Superchargers (centrifugal style) usually max out around 80% efficiency peak. You're dealing with curves, NOT straight lines in forced induction. The goal is to match your needs/purpose, to that peak.
i seeee...i understand what you are saying....thanks
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 12:27 PM
  #29  
beem3r's Avatar
beem3r
Thread Starter
Yamaha :) vrooom!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
beem3r has disabled reputation
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by RandomTask
LoL - god you people are so ignorant.

This thread just made my understanding of forced induction alot better thanks, maybe when i find the M3 I want, I'll hit you guys up again
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #30  
SPAWN's Avatar
SPAWN
I <3 My DSM
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,104
Likes: 0
From: Va Beach
SPAWN has much to be proud ofSPAWN has much to be proud ofSPAWN has much to be proud ofSPAWN has much to be proud ofSPAWN has much to be proud ofSPAWN has much to be proud ofSPAWN has much to be proud ofSPAWN has much to be proud ofSPAWN has much to be proud ofSPAWN has much to be proud ofSPAWN has much to be proud of
Default Re: Turbo vs Supercharger

Originally Posted by beem3r
This thread just made my understanding of forced induction alot better thanks, maybe when i find the M3 I want, I'll hit you guys up again

agreed.....



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 AM.