A couple of pictures in everyones favorite parking garage...
Sorry, I didn't think we were going to throw in all out race motors with stupid amounts of compression. With that being said, I am not calling you a liar, but I would personally need to see that on the dyno to believe those numbers are NA. As far as your other statement, I was talking about NA motors. I think the RSX 2.0 motor is rated at 200 bhp or maybe the GSR motor is as well. I am not sure, and the arguement is not that important to look it up. That would put it at 100bhp/liter which is more than the 72bhp/liter of the LS7, right?
not to bust anyones bubble but i dont really see where horsepower to liter comes in to effect anywhere... stock 100bhp/liter rsx vs. stock 72bhp/liter z06 means what? dont even try to argue that the rsx would ever ever EVER amount to anything compared to the z06 because it wouldnt! no roll race, dig, drift, handling, or anything... so basicaly the efficency of the 4 cylinder means dick! the corvette is faster now tell me why when it has such a low bhp/liter compared to the rsx... o wait maybe because its a 4 cylinder and 4 bangers suck dick and will never be more efficent because they are only half the engine a v8 ever will be and i mean that litterally and figuratively! now have a nice day 

I'm not a big fan of American V8s, been there done that, for me it's German all the way. Sorry "my shit is bigger, and better".
That's what we're all arguing right? hahahahaEDIT: You drive a 4 cyl, wtf was your rant above about then?
not to bust anyones bubble but i dont really see where horsepower to liter comes in to effect anywhere... stock 100bhp/liter rsx vs. stock 72bhp/liter z06 means what? dont even try to argue that the rsx would ever ever EVER amount to anything compared to the z06 because it wouldnt! no roll race, dig, drift, handling, or anything... so basicaly the efficency of the 4 cylinder means dick! the corvette is faster now tell me why when it has such a low bhp/liter compared to the rsx... o wait maybe because its a 4 cylinder and 4 bangers suck dick and will never be more efficent because they are only half the engine a v8 ever will be and i mean that litterally and figuratively! now have a nice day 

it embarasses me to see people pull out the "oh yeah?!but my car makes xxHP per liter!" argument.....
i'd rather just build a small engine in a light chassis will actually be comparable to that big displacement car in terms of power to weight,efficiency be damned!
Chris
Negative I drive an SS camaro and so does my girlfriend. That's her integra and its just a DD I do sumtimes drive a 4 cylinder however a 97 Toyota cool-rola with 305k miles lol not a very efficent car at all makes like 35 wheel horsepower and gets like 8 miles to the gallon but its just a beater I don't really hate 4 cylindes tho there's sum crazy fast 4 bangers out there I was just board last night and wanted to argue lol
I can't believe people still bring out that hp/liter crap.
Chris hit the nail on the head, the only thing that matters is power/weight, period.
Chris hit the nail on the head, the only thing that matters is power/weight, period.






supercharger. 
