Notices
Automotive Gallery Vehicle (meaning anything with an engine) and related pictures and videos go here, everything else goes in one of the Eye-Candy forums.


2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 Dynoed

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 10:56 PM
  #81  
Finaltheorem47's Avatar
Finaltheorem47
Registered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Finaltheorem47 Finaltheorem47 Finaltheorem47 Finaltheorem47 Finaltheorem47 Finaltheorem47 Finaltheorem47 Finaltheorem47
Default Re: 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 Dynoed

Originally Posted by nismo
dick.


go blow it.
No thanks.
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 04:25 AM
  #82  
brew engineer's Avatar
brew engineer
Bootlegger
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Church Hill, Richmond, VA
brew engineer has disabled reputation
Default Re: 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 Dynoed

Originally Posted by Finaltheorem47
Actually the 03'-04' Cobra was deemed "Terminator" because it was supposed to be the Mustang of Mustangs that killed the competition: the Camaro. Problem was, Chevy had already stopped production the previous year on the Camaro, but the Ford engineers decided to go through with it since they were already in the latter part of the development stages on the 03'-04' Cobra.

If you're interested in SVT/Terminator history, there's a great book out called Iron Fist, Lead Foot, By John Coletti that is a fantastic read for any SVT/Terminator enthusiast.

http://www.amazon.com/Iron-Fist-Lead.../dp/0595409709
I sometimes forget about the 03-04 Cobra. That was an amazing car. When I ran autoX in Chicago, my roommate would drive one as her race car. The owner never drove the car on the road. It had 15k miles, all on the track.
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 04:29 AM
  #83  
Flite's Avatar
Flite
HHIC
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 19,087
Likes: 0
Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite
Default Re: 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 Dynoed

I still for the life of me can not understand the aregument that it is bad for a motor to be nearly maxed out from the factory. I mean, if the LSx can slap on 50hp with a good set of headers and an intake... why didn't Chevy sell it that way?

All Ford did is save you the hassle of spending piddly money to free up hidden power. They already unlocked it.
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 05:03 AM
  #84  
JDM74's Avatar
JDM74
Registered member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74
Default Re: 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 Dynoed

Originally Posted by Flite
I still for the life of me can not understand the aregument that it is bad for a motor to be nearly maxed out from the factory. I mean, if the LSx can slap on 50hp with a good set of headers and an intake... why didn't Chevy sell it that way?

All Ford did is save you the hassle of spending piddly money to free up hidden power. They already unlocked it.
First, you can't add 50 hp with a set of headers and an intake. Maybe 30 with a tune. That is with long tube headers not shorties. Shorties have shown no gains on the LS1. Long tubes are not practical from an emmissions stand point on a factory car. Could they haven gotten more out of cast manifolds? On a vette probably not, F-body, maybe a little.

LSX motors have good flowing heads and are there for limited by cam specifications (read emissions). That is why cam swaps make good gains on LSX motors with stock heads.

AS far as maxed out from the factory being good or bad, that depends on what kind of car guy you are. If you like to modify your car to increase power, it's not an attractive thing. If you like to buy a car and just drive it, it is a good thing for you. It all depends on your point of view. Personally, I can't leave anything stock so I look at it as undesireable.
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 05:09 AM
  #85  
Daft Punk's Avatar
Daft Punk
Gaming Extraordinair
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 29,292
Likes: 0
From: 757
Daft Punk Daft Punk Daft Punk Daft Punk Daft Punk Daft Punk Daft Punk Daft Punk Daft Punk Daft Punk Daft Punk
Default Re: 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 Dynoed

Originally Posted by JDM74
First, you can't add 50 hp with a set of headers and an intake. Maybe 30 with a tune. That is with long tube headers not shorties. Shorties have shown no gains on the LS1. Long tubes are not practical from an emmissions stand point on a factory car. Could they haven gotten more out of cast manifolds? On a vette probably not, F-body, maybe a little.

LSX motors have good flowing heads and are there for limited by cam specifications (read emissions). That is why cam swaps make good gains on LSX motors with stock heads.

AS far as maxed out from the factory being good or bad, that depends on what kind of car guy you are. If you like to modify your car to increase power, it's not an attractive thing. If you like to buy a car and just drive it, it is a good thing for you. It all depends on your point of view. Personally, I can't leave anything stock so I look at it as undesireable.
sarcasm.....sense it......
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 05:12 AM
  #86  
JDM74's Avatar
JDM74
Registered member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74
Default Re: 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 Dynoed

Originally Posted by Daft Punk
sarcasm.....sense it......
Sarcasm sensor not calibrated on this computer
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 05:33 AM
  #87  
Flite's Avatar
Flite
HHIC
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 19,087
Likes: 0
Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite Flite
Default Re: 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 Dynoed

Originally Posted by JDM74
Sarcasm sensor not calibrated on this computer
The only sarcasm was the 50hp number with intake and headers. The rest of my statement wasn't meant to be sarcastic at all.

I just think, in my opinion, Ford wins this round pretty clearly. Being the "type of car modding guy" I am, I like the fact that Ford has taken care of all the small stuff. Good headers, high flowing heads, high compression, high revs, etc etc. They've taken care of all the small stuff and left big upgrades (Cams, forced induction, etc) in the hands of the consumer. I also like the fact that this motor appears to have been built with future factory forced induction options in mind.

Now... If they could only put this motor in a smaller, more nimble chassis, and make a vette competitor, they would be full of win.
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 05:41 AM
  #88  
Cobra4B's Avatar
Cobra4B
Fanboi
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 24,919
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B
Default Re: 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 Dynoed

Originally Posted by brew engineer
Ignorance. You are comparing a much larger engine in a much more expensive platform to a moderately priced pony car. Further more, you didn't even know the late model 4.6L is 3v. No use arguing with someone that doesn't have a clue what they are talking about. BTW, the late model 4.6L is far far from maxed out from the factory and can reach 400whp N/A for around $3k. The reason more people don't do it is because you can hit 450-500whp reliably with forced induction for a couple grand more. Also, there are SC kits that are covered under the factory warranty. Stop being naive and jealous that ford finally built a Camaro killer.
Originally Posted by brew engineer
I sometimes forget about the 03-04 Cobra. That was an amazing car. When I ran autoX in Chicago, my roommate would drive one as her race car. The owner never drove the car on the road. It had 15k miles, all on the track.
Dumbass.... I know the stupid retro mustang GTs are 3V cars.... but the '96-'98, '99, and '01 Cobras are all 4V as are the Mach1's, 2003-2004 cars and the GT500s too. Please show me where you can get heads, cams, and botons and a tune for $3000... I'm calling BS on that.

And LOL @ anyone who thinks a 2003-2004 Cobra is an "amazing car".... the car has a great engine setup from the Factory, but it's hardly an amazing car.
Stop being naive and jealous that ford finally built a Camaro killer
Quit being a moron and go back and read my initial posts in this thread....
Originally Posted by Flite
I still for the life of me can not understand the aregument that it is bad for a motor to be nearly maxed out from the factory. I mean, if the LSx can slap on 50hp with a good set of headers and an intake... why didn't Chevy sell it that way?

All Ford did is save you the hassle of spending piddly money to free up hidden power. They already unlocked it.
See the bottom part of the thread below... some people like to be able to tweak/change w/o doing a full overhaul or a $10k FI build.
Originally Posted by JDM74
First, you can't add 50 hp with a set of headers and an intake. Maybe 30 with a tune. That is with long tube headers not shorties. Shorties have shown no gains on the LS1. Long tubes are not practical from an emmissions stand point on a factory car. Could they haven gotten more out of cast manifolds? On a vette probably not, F-body, maybe a little.

LSX motors have good flowing heads and are there for limited by cam specifications (read emissions). That is why cam swaps make good gains on LSX motors with stock heads.

AS far as maxed out from the factory being good or bad, that depends on what kind of car guy you are. If you like to modify your car to increase power, it's not an attractive thing. If you like to buy a car and just drive it, it is a good thing for you. It all depends on your point of view. Personally, I can't leave anything stock so I look at it as undesireable.
I disagree w/ your first part... LS3 Corvettes are gaining 40-50 rwhp w/ a CAI, Lt headers and a tune. They make around 380 rwhp bone stock and 425-435 w/ the basic bolt-ons.

@Flite - Part of the reason the LSXs respond so well to mods is that GM has to make them pass emissions and EPA of course, make them easy to service/assemble, and validate them to run for 200,000 miles in all conditions. Thus... you can't put LTs on from the factory because they make the clutch/driveline harder to work on, you can't run a CAI because it doesn't filter quite as well for that old lady who lives in Arizona and drives in the sand, etc. etc.

They've changed this some w/ the LS7 as the stock air intake and manifolds are really nice bits, but there is still about 50 rwhp on the table via intake, headers, tune.

Last edited by Cobra4B; Mar 26, 2010 at 05:57 AM.
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 05:52 AM
  #89  
JDM74's Avatar
JDM74
Registered member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74 JDM74
Default Re: 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 Dynoed

Originally Posted by Cobra4B
I disagree w/ your first part... LS3 Corvettes are gaining 40-50 rwhp w/ a CAI, Lt headers and a tune. They make around 380 rwhp bone stock and 425-435 w/ the basic bolt-ons.
I guess I was thinking more along the lines of the smaller displacement LSX's. Impressive for the LS3's geting that kind of stuff out of bolt ons.
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 05:56 AM
  #90  
Cobra4B's Avatar
Cobra4B
Fanboi
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 24,919
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B Cobra4B
Default Re: 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 Dynoed

That's the beauty of having 6.2 liters and L92 heads.... a moderate cam that makes 430 rwhp in my LS6 would make 460-470 in the LS3 w/o ever taking the heads off the car.

But anyway... I really like the new 5.0 and it's good that Ford has stepped it up finally. It'll probably sound amazing w/ some exhaust spinning 7000 rpms.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:44 AM.