Evo vs. STI
<3
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,503
Likes: 0
From: Va Beach
Re: Evo vs. STI
True... fact: 2 S/C 350s vs 1 Evo...
http://www.modified.com/modifiedmag/...agpreview.html
#1 tuner car in the US... btw the 350Z is classed as a tuner, thats right tuner. Thanks for playing.
http://www.modified.com/modifiedmag/...agpreview.html
#1 tuner car in the US... btw the 350Z is classed as a tuner, thats right tuner. Thanks for playing.
If it was the same driver then it would be a fair comparision.
Neither car is better in my opinion, there are plenty of high HP twin turbo track prepped 350z's and even some Grand-Am Cup Z's that would put up a better fight than those two Z's did. I have passed a supercharged Z at VIR myself.
This argument is stupid. You want a Evo, buy one. You want a Z go ahead. I'm sick of fucking people on this board bashing the car for no reason other than message board bullshit.
I'll be at Summit Point with NASA next month, and then VIR the following month. If people are gonna talk shit, then come do it at the track.
thanks for playing.
Last edited by Axelerate; May 13, 2007 at 07:42 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Re: Evo vs. STI
Wow.. Looks like you guys have met Shayan. He was banned from our boards (my350z.com) for this sort of thing.. and I see he is still at it.
Not cool.
Don't let this one Z owner make you think we all have the 'holier than thou' attitude. We are all enthusiasts (EVI, STI, Z, RSX ).
Edit: I go up to CFA quite a bit. If you see me say Hi. I have a silver 350 ... can't really miss it
Not cool.
Don't let this one Z owner make you think we all have the 'holier than thou' attitude. We are all enthusiasts (EVI, STI, Z, RSX
).Edit: I go up to CFA quite a bit. If you see me say Hi. I have a silver 350 ... can't really miss it
Last edited by mdracer76; May 14, 2007 at 04:43 AM.
Banned
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Re: Evo vs. STI
That by no means is slow and that is faster than MOST EVO and STI owner times bone stock. Now if a EVO / STI used their awd and did a 5k launch yes they would have a low 1/4 time but a slow trap. If they took off like any other car does at the drag strip they would get their butt handed to them by the 350z. They are only quick from the dig, after that they aren't faster.
M3 just to correct you on a few things. The G35 is just as fast as the 350z, and btw, it actually HANDLES better than the 350z due to it being more stable and a longer wheel base.
UNCE UNCE UNCE UNCE
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,811
Likes: 0
From: J'Ville FL.
Re: Evo vs. STI
Actually a bone stock 2007 6mt Base 350z with no LSD, and no other type of options ran 13.3 in the 1/4 with a bad clutch.
That by no means is slow and that is faster than MOST EVO and STI owner times bone stock. Now if a EVO / STI used their awd and did a 5k launch yes they would have a low 1/4 time but a slow trap. If they took off like any other car does at the drag strip they would get their butt handed to them by the 350z. They are only quick from the dig, after that they aren't faster.
M3 just to correct you on a few things. The G35 is just as fast as the 350z, and btw, it actually HANDLES better than the 350z due to it being more stable and a longer wheel base.
That by no means is slow and that is faster than MOST EVO and STI owner times bone stock. Now if a EVO / STI used their awd and did a 5k launch yes they would have a low 1/4 time but a slow trap. If they took off like any other car does at the drag strip they would get their butt handed to them by the 350z. They are only quick from the dig, after that they aren't faster.
M3 just to correct you on a few things. The G35 is just as fast as the 350z, and btw, it actually HANDLES better than the 350z due to it being more stable and a longer wheel base.
TAINT PUNCHER!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,041
Likes: 0
From: Portsmouth