You don't have to be such a fucking dick about it.

 

+1

 

Seriously though,

Stock block

530 at the crank

Tuned a little rich

I think that he's got the right idea, . Why push it farther and risk failure?
Nice numbers btw!!

 

Im not saying that running rich is a bad thing. Its just not the setting I would keep in the long run.

 

Tune it rich if you want it to stay together and you use it on the street.

12.5 would be fine if you were on race fuel and did not daily drive the car.

 

Running slightly leaner will gain little to no power. Going to 12.5:1 is stupid, no offense, 11.5 is plenty and gives much more room for power gains with increased timing and boost. The little that you could lean out in AF and gain, is overshadowed quite a bit by ignition timing and boost gains. On an NA car, fine tune for 12.5:1, but don't do it on a boosted one.

BTW Andrew, assuming the 22% drivetrain loss that most people say, 436awhp would be around 550 crank hp . Not too bad for a "weak" rod stock internaled motor huh?

 

Haha, I stand corrected. It'd be nice to see what times you'd pull with this tune.

 

+1 the internet makes it way too easy to spread misinformation.

good #'s Chris, IMO the a/f's look great. if it's not knocking too badly, adding a couple degrees might help that misfire.

 

you make more power than me a little before 4k and probably more torque at idle!

i bet that's a fun car. clean, with good usable power. i give you a for good work.

 

436 / 368... Well done bro. I am sure you're happy with it.


Edit: for stock motors.