View Poll Results: Is a vehicle that's ugly but fast still gay?
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 138. You may not vote on this poll
Ugly, but fast, still GAY?
Unless it's an AE86, Datsun 510, or really REALLY well built Dodge Omni I wouldn't touch it. But those cars came ugly from the factory (and oh so cute!)
This dude is by far the maddest guy on Driven. And he didn't spend a lot of money on the looks. If you could read everything on the outside is a replica and Rotas
Ok, so there's an on-going debate on cars that people post that are ugly as fuck, or the ugliness out-weighs the overall appearance of the vehicle, and they try to get you to see past the complete waste of time and money spent on the appearance of the vehicle, and realize how fast it is or draw your attention to the performance aspects of said vehicle.
So my question to VAD is.. if a vehicle is pro-dominantly ugly, but has decent quality mods under the hood and decently fast (12 sec 1/4 mile at least) is it still gay, or is the overall hideousness acceptable or tolerable given the performance of it? I say tasteful, genuine, rare mods and pretty quick if not shit-ur-pants fast is undoubtedly the Win overall.
So my question to VAD is.. if a vehicle is pro-dominantly ugly, but has decent quality mods under the hood and decently fast (12 sec 1/4 mile at least) is it still gay, or is the overall hideousness acceptable or tolerable given the performance of it? I say tasteful, genuine, rare mods and pretty quick if not shit-ur-pants fast is undoubtedly the Win overall.
I think it depends on why it's ugly. If it's ugly because it's a little beat up, or fender was replaced with one that's a different color, or something like that, but fast because all the time was spent making it fast, but not pretty, that's ok. I can deal with that, as it's more than likely purpose built, with fast being the purpose. If the person spent as much time on the look as he did the speed, and it comes out horribly ugly, then it's gay.



















